User talk:BeepYou

current talk page

Archive

1. 1

In case you haven't noticed...

By the way, I picked up Palutena again. She's actually decent... Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 07:41, 21 February 2016 (EST)

See what I mean? She just needs a ton of patience and skill. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2016 (EST)

You asked for it

Reminder: Please use the Show preview button located next to the Save page button to preview your edits. This prevents consecutive edits to the same page from clogging up the recent changes list.

Poultry(talk) the Pumpkin Pie 15:21, 23 February 2016 (EST)

:'V -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 15:22, 23 February 2016 (EST)

You know

If you're as good as DF says you are, you should find me on Facebook; I happen to know a competitive Palu myself, as well as a whole group of other Smashers, and you'd definitely go well with them. :D Aidan, the Wandering Dragon Warrior 10:37, 25 February 2016 (EST)

Really? Gimme a link to his page or somethin'! -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 13:33, 25 February 2016 (EST)

Two important things.

1:

Reminder: There is a policy in place that prohibits multiple reversions of the same edit. Please refrain from reverting or repeating an edit that has already been undone. Instead, bring the subject up on the article's associated talk page.

2: Wow, I didn't notice that? I need to get my eyes checked...

Penro ...that's all. 20:52, 29 February 2016 (EST)

1.- I don't recall breaking SW:1RV since the time I was the only idiot that was reverting Palutena's page.

2.- No worries.

-- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 23:14, 29 February 2016 (EST)

On Abadango, you broke 1RV. Penro ...that's all. 16:29, 1 March 2016 (EST).

Technically no. Unless we had done it twice. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2016 (EST)

What?I reverted your edit, then you reverted mine. That goes against the policy. Penro ...that's all. 19:40, 1 March 2016 (EST)

As it is a good faith edit and wasn't undone repeteadly, SW:1RV doesn't really apply there, IIRC. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 19:48, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Question

Would you like me to add transparency to your signature? Not that it really matters in a white background, but still. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 12:07, 1 March 2016 (EST)

I do have the tools to do it. But not the time. So plz...

One thing, tho. I won't need Roy or Corrin on my sig, could you help me by removing them plz? -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2016 (EST)

I am apparently too fast. I should quit playing Sonic. Anyway, I'll try. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2016 (EST)

Your sig is funky

The datestamp after your sig is bolded because you're missing a ''' at the end. You should probably fix that. Toomai Glittershine El Pollo 09:41, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Thanks! And thanks for the rollback! -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 13:19, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Congratulations!

You have rollback! I'm not exactly sure about the victory music thing, so I'll let someone else do that. -- Ethan(Discussion) 12:16, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Here you go! Congrats man. :D Disaster Flare (talk) 12:23, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Oh yea. Congrats! Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 12:56, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Thanks to you all! ^-^

I promise to make good use of it. Nothing more than that. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 13:20, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Anti.

Did you see the talk before making that move? We don't stylize Mango, so why Anti? Penro ...that's all. 19:31, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Oh god, never did it. Srsly. Though it's been since Brawl's death and SSB4's birth (like 3 years) he changed it. MaNg0 is, as far as I know... year and a half? -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2016 (EST)

My edits

1) My bad on the subject performing attacks. I'll take that into account from here on out.

2) I use synonyms that are a little more professional and I avoid using contractions within the pages since it's a wiki and thus should be encyclopedic.

3) I seriously doubt that my tweaks make pages significantly heavier. The only pages that are the most notable exemptions off the top of my head are Duck Hunt and Dr. Mario, both of which even then had only their attributes sections expanded since I found some traits of theirs that warranted inclusion, yet hadn't been included for unknown reasons.

And in regards to making an account, rest assured that won't be happening since it's pointless when I already have a talk page. 173.171.56.222 09:58, 12 March 2016 (EST)

Should Trela be considered the best Ryu as of now?

Well if you look at it, 9B was Trela's main competition, and 9B is now a Bayonetta main. Trela was also the only Ryu to get Top 32 at Genesis 3 (which is considered a Global tournament by the SmashBoards Rankings). Think about how your Mexican homeboy Hyuga was the only Toon Link in Top 32 of the same tournament and people have officially declared him as best Toon Link. Should this be the same for the Texan Terror that is Trela.

What's your thoughts on Trela being #1 Ryu? Does he deserve the title? -- Falconian Leader (Enter the Leader's Office) 14:41, 14 March 2016 (EST)

You bet. Since GENESIS 3 he should've been considered the best Ryu, since he lost much later than 9B. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2016 (EDT)

in my mind trela was always the best ryu (GimR and Venom are up there too)Poultry(talk) the Pumpkin Pie 15:26, 14 March 2016 (EDT)

I concur on Trela. He was always maining low tiers (Charizard, Robin, Mii S), a top tier like Ryu was all what he needed. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 15:32, 14 March 2016 (EDT)

IRC

Could I see you there? There's something you wanted to say to me if I remember correctly. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 16:55, 23 March 2016 (EDT)

Hey

With my not so many but big edits, can I get rollback? Swagman, the Green Swordsman 18:21, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

Dear lord. First, that is not how you get rollback. Second, BeepYou is not even the right person to ask anyways. Please go ask SW:RFR instead. Dots (talk) The Uber 18:28, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

Thanks for covering me Dots. I told you, Swagman, to read the freaking rules to get rollback, so why would you ask me about something I told you? -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 23:37, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

Meint

No hay problema, un gusto poder ayudar, y gracias :3 Joaco (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2016 (EDT)

Link buffs

You hate Sakurai for heavily buffing Link? I'm just asking. -- Ethan(Discussion) 13:03, 21 April 2016 (EDT)

I doubt your topic is talk page appropriate. Smash Master 13:47, 21 April 2016 (EDT)

Actually, I don't hate him only for buffing Link, I hate it when he unnecessarily buffs good characters and leaves bad characters like that or worsens them. IMO, he unnecessarily buffed Link in 1.1.3 and 1.1.5. And has unnecessarily buffed Kirby as well in said patches, even though Kirby's pros were on par with his cons. If you look at their buffs, their already high KO power was further increased when it wasn't necessary. And Smash Master has some point, this question could be a bit debatable for a talk page according to SW:TALK, not that I mind. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 13:58, 21 April 2016 (EDT)

I'm pretty sure you can use user talk pages for smaller discussions like this. I know what you mean by how "he" buffed Link and gave him less useful buffs. And I doubt Sakurai is actually the one doing balance stuff. -- Ethan(Discussion) 21:16, 22 April 2016 (EDT)

I know he's not the only one (and you'll saaaaay I'm crazy :V), I meant he approves the buffs Link receives every patch. However, the developing team overdoses Link with buffs instead of buffing characters that need them like Jiggs, Duck Hunt, Dedede, etc. It's just my opinion though. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2016 (EDT)

Bro

Check my userpage. Penro 16:40, 28 April 2016 (EDT)

Technical/Move Data

I appreciate you providing me with the links to that page with all the SSB4 code, but when I was trying to create new pages for characters' moves, it wouldn't let me do that. What's up with that? CpnFlacon (talk) 23:49, 28 April 2016 (EDT)

You have to be autoconfirmed to create a page (which means you need to have an account active for 7 days and have made at least 10 edits). Serpent King 23:55, 28 April 2016 (EDT)

But looking at your account, you are autoconfirmed...so what exactly is the message you get? Serpent King 23:57, 28 April 2016 (EDT)

Thanks for the prompt answer, Serpent. And actually I don't know what I was doing wrong the first time, but now it's letting me do it. So, thanks, I guess? Lol o.O So I'll get started on the SSB4 moves pages very soon; probably tomorrow. Btw I've been meaning to ask someone about this: Is there a userbox I can add to my user page to indicate that I'm mainly a nocturnal user? CpnFlacon (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2016 (EDT)

What exactly is your source? Oh and use {{Userbox}}. Serpent King 00:05, 29 April 2016 (EDT)

Ahh, thanks! And I'm using a page of game code which BeepYou was so kind as to provide me with. The original conversation is over on Disaster Flare's talk page. CpnFlacon (talk) 00:11, 29 April 2016 (EDT)

lol it seems SK already responded to you, so the only thing I have to add is that I too, have no idea why would it not let you create a page. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 02:01, 29 April 2016 (EDT)

IP Revert

Did a quick look at the ip's edit; that edit made the page sound more professional (from what I glanced at). It's pretty fucking unacceptable when you choose to not treat an IP editor with an ounce of respect, especially if you even bothered to look at the IP's history. Your talk page post on doesn't excuse some backwards IP prejudice that "tramples on all muh hard work". If someone did it better, swallow your ego. 172.56.31.143 13:33, 9 May 2016 (EDT)

That's why I was going to rewrite a bit the page again. I mean, SW is encyclopaedic, but there are a few limitations we can sometimes take. I'd also take in mind the IP's edits into mine. And no, sometimes said IPs (not all the IPs or all the time), do a good job, but I dislike how they often don't hear a lot about what should be done and what not. And yes, I am aware I may have some ego to swallow. Also, SW is not censored, though remember to watch your tone. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2016 (EDT)

And what arbitrary consensus about style did that IP break when he/she changed "has got" to "receive" and "hurts" to "hinders"? The fact that you even resorted to a complete undo instead of specific undos is absurdly counter-productive to progress. Whether or not that minor infraction deserves this much flack is irrelevant if you're wondering; pointing out terrible edit practices is better for improvement than letting it slide. 172.56.31.143 13:51, 9 May 2016 (EDT)

From what I saw, there was little to nothing wrong with the edit. Can you explain what was wrong with the edit itself? Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 13:53, 9 May 2016 (EDT)

Nothing very extreme, I just exaggerated with it. What happens is that I strongly disapprove of edits that are destinated to save bits by using non-official terms (such as "growth" over "scaling" when the latter IS the correct term, and even I knew it in the past) or not really pointing out some kind of change in value (such as Link walking slightly slower than in Brawl, Kirby being slightly heavier, or Puff dashing slightly faster), because they don't really affect them but to an inconsequential degree. Yes I know the IP used some other terms that sound more professional, but even though we are meant to be it, haven't we taken some limitations in order to not always have the same plain descriptions?

I know I'll possibly get a warning to calm down and respect users as they're valuable, so I have nothing to add to my defense, Iand I would not be mad for you doing such. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 14:06, 9 May 2016 (EDT)

Well, dang

Seems like everyone around me is slowly losing faith in Roy. I still believe he's decent, but aghhh. Tahu Mata, The Toa of Fire (talk)

Sorry Ragnarok, but Roy's biggest strength is also his biggest weakness. Possibly he is not as bad as he was in Melee, but has he improved relative to the cast? I don't think so >_> -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 20:28, 31 May 2016 (EDT)

Ehhhh, I'd say otherwise, but that's a whole another topic in itself. I still respect your decision, though.

It'll be tough, but I'll try my absolute best to make our boy rise up. Tahu Mata, The Toa of Fire (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2016 (EDT)

Most recent edit

This exists, dude. Penro 21:39, 4 June 2016 (EDT)

I know. And I refer to every IP with lousy edits in general, not a single IP. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 22:26, 4 June 2016 (EDT)

"I didn't like how someone edited, so I'll just say "fuck them". It's ok, I say it to every bad IP, and it's an ip, so it won't matter".

Honestly, nothing you could possibly say would justify your antagonistic views on IPs. Saying "I know" is also pretty terrible because you've already raged out at IPs before just because you didn't like the way they worded an article. I'm not gonna dig through the Mewtwo page history here just to point out some minute way you've made the page sound worse, but the overall point still stands; don't be an ass. MegaTron1 00:35, 5 June 2016 (EDT)

First and foremost, point out how did I make the page sound worse.

Second of all, and next time, mind your own business, would you? I'm not being an ass here, I'm being stern to your nosy behavior. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2016 (EDT)

Okay, okay, settle down. I do agree your behavior was pretty out of line with this one, but Megatron, I say this with all due respect, you're not one to talk, as I can name a number of recent times where you've badmouthed people for no intentions other than to start a fight. Disaster Flare (talk) 00:50, 5 June 2016 (EDT)

If a smoker tells you that smoking is bad, does the validity of the statement suddenly go away? MegaTron1 01:03, 5 June 2016 (EDT)

While I agree I was an ass with the IPs (some salt I don't think I'll be able to deal with), I want Megatron to respond me. He started the fight, now he must end it. I'm so freaking tired of him because of that. -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 00:55, 5 June 2016 (EDT)

Not seeing how Mega started a fight here. I've been watching this unfold, and I have to say, BeepYou, you are entirely in the wrong here. I ask that you cease this foolishness. Serpent King 00:57, 5 June 2016 (EDT)

I'll provide a response tomorrow if you ask for it. Getting mad is pretty much detrimental to any argument. MegaTron1 01:03, 5 June 2016 (EDT)

Fine... -- BeepYou, a user with no grammar at all :v (talk) 01:06, 5 June 2016 (EDT)