User talk:Cookies and Creme
|
NOTE: Put all new talk page posts on the bottom of the page. Thank you :) |
| The Archives | ||
|---|---|---|
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
| Archive 4 | Archive 5 | |
About Category:Infobox templates[edit]
I just noticed that the templates (excluding Template:Infobox itself) were ordered in alphabetical order (minus the word "infobox" for templates containing that word). I tried to help out with that and order the ones that were listed under "I" that started with another letter (minus "infobox") where they should go. It was all a misunderstanding, and also why are all of those templates listed under I? Sure, I know, they all start with "I" (minus ones that don't start with "infobox"), but some templates that started with "infobox" were listed under "I" instead of the first letter of the second word in the template name. I was just saying, this whole thing was just a misunderstanding. Mario Maniac (talk) 00:35, April 6, 2026 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, it really does not matter how it's ordered, as long as it's categorized properly. Cookies
Creme 00:57, April 6, 2026 (UTC)
So, I’ve been moving some Smasher pages.[edit]
Some smasher articles had {{move}} on them, and I decided to help out on the wiki and move them. Autoconfirmed users have the ability to move user pages, smasher and team articles, and files. I'm not established yet, so I can't help out with moving articles in other namespaces. Just saying, so you understand why I moved some Smasher articles. 
Mario Maniac 
22:25, April 19, 2026 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, some of them should have been moved to begin with, and not marked for merge. That being said, it's better to wait for a consensus on most move candidates before you actually do them. CookiesCreme 22:42, April 19, 2026 (UTC)
“Nothing of note” in the context of a talk page[edit]
I was wondering what you meant by "nothing of note" when tagging the talk page associated with Shiro's smasher article for speedy deletion. If you don't remember, then that's fine. 
Mario Maniac 
23:44, June 20, 2026 (UTC)
- A single, meaningless word made by an IP who has only made that edit isn't anything of note. CookiesCreme 23:47, June 20, 2026 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
I hope I didn't come across as rude on the talk page for Mushroom Platform. As word has probably gone around, I've had a rough near-decade in circles related to this wiki, leading me to paranoia over being scrutinized. And believe me, I am actively trying my best this past week here. And I had a public-domain waiver for my original writing so it can be easily ported somewhere else if that need be. Know what I'm saying? Conker the Squirrel (talk) 03:44, August 26, 2026 (UTC)
- I don't see how a public domain waiver does anything here since no one owns what they write on SmashWiki anyways. But nothing tone-wise stands out so you're fine at the moment. CookiesCreme 03:58, August 26, 2026 (UTC)
- Have you heard of the "copyleft trap" of CC BY-SA? Yes, I reuse content under that license all the time, but I also had to learn about how copyleft works. So let's say I reused my own work elsewhere, and someone pointed out I didn't follow the terms of the CC BY-SA license (the minimum being a link to the original source and, if server goes down, the chain-of custody for original authorship); my userpage would serve as a paper trail to prove that my original contributions (most effectively seen when I'm making completely new origin sections or articles) would show the proof that I authorized my own work elsewhere. Conker the Squirrel (talk) 04:02, August 26, 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think anyone has the time or money to try to perform a copyleft trap on a wiki as small as SmashWiki. CookiesCreme 04:08, August 26, 2026 (UTC)
- I thought this wiki was pretty big. It's just... declined in activity over time; a lot of my talk page questions and even proposals are still in the backlog.
- I don't think anyone has the time or money to try to perform a copyleft trap on a wiki as small as SmashWiki. Cookies
- Have you heard of the "copyleft trap" of CC BY-SA? Yes, I reuse content under that license all the time, but I also had to learn about how copyleft works. So let's say I reused my own work elsewhere, and someone pointed out I didn't follow the terms of the CC BY-SA license (the minimum being a link to the original source and, if server goes down, the chain-of custody for original authorship); my userpage would serve as a paper trail to prove that my original contributions (most effectively seen when I'm making completely new origin sections or articles) would show the proof that I authorized my own work elsewhere. Conker the Squirrel (talk) 04:02, August 26, 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-related, but have you heard that I'm trying to scrub SmashWiki content from Smashpedia? Even pre-fork. That should finally give it a distinct identity without being dragged through the mud with poorly formatted content and plagiarism unaddressed for over a decade. On the other hand, anti-Fandom people will argue that might help the wiki. Sort of double-edged. Conker the Squirrel (talk) 04:14, August 26, 2026 (UTC)
