Talk:Buff: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision: pages) |
Smash Master (talk | contribs) m (→Split: Grammar) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Attacks?== | ==Attacks?== | ||
Why is buffing confined only to "attacks" buffed? There are other factors that can be buffed about a character such as weight, speed, recovery, size, traction, etc. Plus the article currently states in the intro "...From Melee to Brawl, Zelda is '''slightly quicker''', Din's Fire was improved,..." The slightly quicker part has nothing to do with attacks. I think the buffed article (as well as the nerfed article while we're on the subject) should be changed to just "buffed", not "the strengthing of a veteran character's '''attacks'''" or "Characters who had '''attacks''' buffed..." Anyone else agree? [[User:Enigmatic Mr. L|Enigmatic Mr. L]] ([[User talk:Enigmatic Mr. L|talk]]) 13:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | Why is buffing confined only to "attacks" buffed? There are other factors that can be buffed about a character such as weight, speed, recovery, size, traction, etc. Plus the article currently states in the intro "...From Melee to Brawl, Zelda is '''slightly quicker''', Din's Fire was improved,..." The slightly quicker part has nothing to do with attacks. I think the buffed article (as well as the nerfed article while we're on the subject) should be changed to just "buffed", not "the strengthing of a veteran character's '''attacks'''" or "Characters who had '''attacks''' buffed..." Anyone else agree? [[User:Enigmatic Mr. L|Enigmatic Mr. L]] ([[User talk:Enigmatic Mr. L|talk]]) 13:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Split== | |||
'''Oppose''' This page shows buffs for every game, which in my opinion, is better than having a page that only shows buffs for one game. [[User:Bandit|<font style='font-family:myriad pro;font-size:13pt;color:hsl(167.75,100%,50%)'>Bandit</font>]] 11:11, 1 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' When SSB4 comes out, this page will increase in size massively, and become quite unwieldy to read. Plus it would be better organised than one massive page listing every buff in every game. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 15:24, 1 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' Per OT. <span style="font-family:AR JULIAN; font-size:12pt">[[User:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Chuck</span>]][[User talk:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Norris</span>]]</span>[[File:24.png|23px]] 17:04, 1 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' As I pointed out in the Nerf discussion, SSB4 will double this article as it is. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:Anon.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 20:07, 1 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' Why do we have to discuss this twice? [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="ff8c00">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="01a3c4">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 20:08, 1 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' Will be too massive. <font face="Arial">[[User:ShupaRoeh|<font color="red">Shu</font><font color="green">pa]][[User Talk:ShupaRoeh|</font><font color="blue">Roeh</font></font>]][[File:TypicalGuy.png|19px|link=Special:Contributions/ShupaRoeh]] 20:19, 1 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' Per Omega and Anon. ''[[User:JamesHeart123|<font color="blue">James</font>]][[User talk:JamesHeart123|<font color="orange">Heart</font>]][[Special:Contributions/JamesHeart123|<font color="black">less</font>]]'' 20:24, 1 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' If the buffs were to be described in the same page, it won't be worth reading due to the gargantuan size. <span style="font-family:Corbel; font-size:12pt">[[User:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Smash''']] [[User talk:Smash Master|<span style="color:darkgreen">'''Master'''</span>]]</span></span> 18:18, 16 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' Per all the above points. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 18:19, 16 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
'''Support''' [[User:Dots|Dots]] [[User talk:Dots|The]] [[Special:Contributions/Dots|Laser]] [[File:NintenNESsprite.png|19px]] 18:21, 16 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
This is a long page that's about to get even longer, so I '''support'''. Your average wiki user, <span style="font-family:AR DESTINE">[[User:Air Conditioner|<span style="color:#1EA6D4">Air</span>]] [[User talk:Air Conditioner|<span style="color:#18C4C1">Conditioner</span>]]</span> [[File:AC.png|19px]] Keep cool! 18:23, 16 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:25, September 16, 2012
"characters"[edit]
I won't revert just yet, but I think in order for an entire CHARACTER to be buffed or nerfed, that would require a high degree of unbalance. Not only that, but some characters, like Peach, have had SOME moves buffed and OTHERS nerfed. Can someone help me with this??? - Gargomon251 20:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Pure speculation and some topics from Gfaqs and smashboards. Thats why I put considered in the title. Revert if you like, thats why we're here =] ItemHazard 20:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC) ItemHazard
- I just didn't want to start an edit war. I will leave the SSB64→Melee data because I do feel the original was a bit unbalanced. - Gargomon251 20:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- smash 64 not balanced.....you kidding me right? Its way more balanced than melee or brawl besides Samus and Pikachu. On a related note, Fox is considered second best by most people now in smash 64. I'm changing him to minor User:KoRoBeNiKi
Attacks?[edit]
Why is buffing confined only to "attacks" buffed? There are other factors that can be buffed about a character such as weight, speed, recovery, size, traction, etc. Plus the article currently states in the intro "...From Melee to Brawl, Zelda is slightly quicker, Din's Fire was improved,..." The slightly quicker part has nothing to do with attacks. I think the buffed article (as well as the nerfed article while we're on the subject) should be changed to just "buffed", not "the strengthing of a veteran character's attacks" or "Characters who had attacks buffed..." Anyone else agree? Enigmatic Mr. L (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Split[edit]
Oppose This page shows buffs for every game, which in my opinion, is better than having a page that only shows buffs for one game. Bandit 11:11, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
Support When SSB4 comes out, this page will increase in size massively, and become quite unwieldy to read. Plus it would be better organised than one massive page listing every buff in every game. Omega Tyrant 
15:24, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
Support Per OT. ChuckNorris
17:04, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
Support As I pointed out in the Nerf discussion, SSB4 will double this article as it is. Mr. Anon
talk 20:07, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
Support Why do we have to discuss this twice? Toast 
ltimatum
20:08, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
Support Will be too massive. ShupaRoeh
20:19, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
Support Per Omega and Anon. JamesHeartless 20:24, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
Support If the buffs were to be described in the same page, it won't be worth reading due to the gargantuan size. Smash Master 18:18, 16 September 2012 (EDT)
Support Per all the above points. --RoyboyX Talk 18:19, 16 September 2012 (EDT)
Support Dots The Laser 
18:21, 16 September 2012 (EDT)
This is a long page that's about to get even longer, so I support. Your average wiki user, Air Conditioner 
Keep cool! 18:23, 16 September 2012 (EDT)
