Forum talk:Changelog Digestibility: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*'''Support''' A good idea that will make reading the changes easier to read, and make those sections less messy. '''[[User:Voqéo|<span style="background:#000; color:white; padding:2px 6px;font-size:12px;">Voqéo</span>]][[User talk:Voqéo|<span style="background:#e70012; color:white; padding:2px 4px;font-size:12px;">T</span>]]''' 13:14, 22 November 2018 (EST) | *'''Support''' A good idea that will make reading the changes easier to read, and make those sections less messy. '''[[User:Voqéo|<span style="background:#000; color:white; padding:2px 6px;font-size:12px;">Voqéo</span>]][[User talk:Voqéo|<span style="background:#e70012; color:white; padding:2px 4px;font-size:12px;">T</span>]]''' 13:14, 22 November 2018 (EST) | ||
*'''Support'''. I've been editing the change sections of (SSBB) and (SSB4) pages lately to proof-check and organize them more properly, and I can't help but notice some sub-sections inevitably end up cluttered. An example I can list is [[Link (SSB4)#Aerial attacks|here]]: Link's down aerial got a ton of changes from ''Brawl'' to ''SSB4'', and it's impossible to list them without writing either a few massive bullet points (as it is currently), or a lot of short ones (which is, for example, how most ''SSBU'' pages used to look like), and both result in plenty of clutter. Considering readability is the most important aspect of listing the changes in the first place, and this proposal manages that without sacrificing information or detail, I completely agree with it. [[File:034.png|20px]] '''<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:DracoRexKing|<font color="red">DracoRex,]]</font> [[User talk:DracoRexKing|<font color="olive">Creator of the Land]]</font></span>''' 14:55, 22 November 2018 (EST) | *'''Support'''. I've been editing the change sections of (SSBB) and (SSB4) pages lately to proof-check and organize them more properly, and I can't help but notice some sub-sections inevitably end up cluttered. An example I can list is [[Link (SSB4)#Aerial attacks|here]]: Link's down aerial got a ton of changes from ''Brawl'' to ''SSB4'', and it's impossible to list them without writing either a few massive bullet points (as it is currently), or a lot of short ones (which is, for example, how most ''SSBU'' pages used to look like), and both result in plenty of clutter. Considering readability is the most important aspect of listing the changes in the first place, and this proposal manages that without sacrificing information or detail, I completely agree with it. [[File:034.png|20px]] '''<span style="font-family:Algerian">[[User:DracoRexKing|<font color="red">DracoRex,]]</font> [[User talk:DracoRexKing|<font color="olive">Creator of the Land]]</font></span>''' 14:55, 22 November 2018 (EST) | ||
*I think the general idea of "group moves by list indent" is fine, as long as it doesn't change how people divide the points. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] El Pollo 19:27, 22 November 2018 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:27, November 22, 2018
Discussion
- Support A good idea that will make reading the changes easier to read, and make those sections less messy. VoqéoT 13:14, 22 November 2018 (EST)
- Support. I've been editing the change sections of (SSBB) and (SSB4) pages lately to proof-check and organize them more properly, and I can't help but notice some sub-sections inevitably end up cluttered. An example I can list is here: Link's down aerial got a ton of changes from Brawl to SSB4, and it's impossible to list them without writing either a few massive bullet points (as it is currently), or a lot of short ones (which is, for example, how most SSBU pages used to look like), and both result in plenty of clutter. Considering readability is the most important aspect of listing the changes in the first place, and this proposal manages that without sacrificing information or detail, I completely agree with it.
DracoRex, Creator of the Land 14:55, 22 November 2018 (EST) - I think the general idea of "group moves by list indent" is fine, as long as it doesn't change how people divide the points. Toomai Glittershine
El Pollo 19:27, 22 November 2018 (EST)
