SmashWiki:Requests for bureaucratship

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Revision as of 17:47, August 1, 2018 by ABAP (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Policy.png This page documents an official SmashWiki policy, a widely accepted standard that all users should follow. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. If in doubt, consider discussing changes on the talk page.
Shortcut:
SW:RFB

This page is for requesting that one become a Bureaucrat on the Smash Wiki.

Rules

  • Only users that are already sysops may request a position as a bureaucrat.
  • Only self-nominations are allowed.
  • All new nominees should post their name below in a level 3 header (===Username===). Underneath, the user should state why he/she would like to become a Bureaucrat. To prevent a repetition of past information, all applicants should post a link to the archive of their RfA. Additionally, applicants should explain why they believe they should be a bureaucrat.
  • Users who wish to support, oppose, or comment on the nomination may do so underneath the person requesting bureaucrat.
  • After sufficient time has passed to allow all users who wish to express an opinion the chance to do so, a decision will be made based on community consensus as to whether or not the request will succeed. Once a decision has been made, the discussion will be archived and moved to an appropriate subpage.

Archives

Current Requests

None


ABAP (talkcontribsedit countRFA page)

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
My reason for nomination is because I have been quite active (both on my account/IP) editing and creating pages; not only for my local scene in Minnesota, but I also created Coalition Gaming, Zamu, and Snowy. I am also the one responsible for the total overhawl of AbsentPage's wiki, as I am the social media manager/team manager for Coalition Gaming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ABAP (talkcontribs) 17:48, 1 August 2018 (EDT)

Support

  1. ...

Oppose

  1. Oppose For one, you're not even an admin, so this isn't valid, and for two, you literally put "Username" in place of your actual username, which I have fixed for you. Also, the fact you didn't even sign this means you're clearly inexperienced. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 17:52, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
  2. Oppose, and I move that this application be closed on the grounds of being invalid, as only existing administrators can apply for bureaucratship. Alex the Jigglypuff trainer 17:54, 1 August 2018 (EDT)

Neutral

  1. ...

Comments