Template talk:NIWA bar

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Low priority, but could someone whip up matching svgs to go with the Wars and Strategy wiki links? Miles (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2010 (EDT)

I'll give it a look. Toomai Glittershine Data Node 17:26, 29 October 2010 (EDT)
Got yer .pngs right here. Toomai Glittershine Data Node 11:25, 30 October 2010 (EDT)

Update[edit]

Yesterday, N Wiki was added ;) sorry to make your table there uneven with that lol Malake256 (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2010 (EST)

...uh, it's already on there... Miles (talk) 15:23, 11 December 2010 (EST)
Maybe using the Smash Bros. symbol confused him. Perhaps use the N from the Nintendo logo, or the DS symbol instead? - Reboot (talk) 15:39, 11 December 2010 (EST)
Oops you're right. And yes the symbol may have confused me, I was looking for an "N" lol. Well since I'm here already, from what I know some of SmashWiki's admins are also DKWiki admins, they for sure do not have N Wiki on their NIWA bar. Malake256 (talk) 16:49, 11 December 2010 (EST)

I used the Smash Bros. symbol because I couldn't think of much else (didn't want to use the DS symbol because it's too specific) and it already fit somewhat well (Smash Bros. is "everything Nintendo" in a sense). I like the "N" idea and will do it now. Toomai Glittershine Data Node 18:04, 11 December 2010 (EST)

Speaking of NWiki: http://niwanetwork.org/wiki/index.php/SmashWiki is pretty blank... - Reboot (talk) 04:29, 12 December 2010 (EST)

F-Zero Wiki linking[edit]

Since it's now a NIWA affiliate, is it a good idea to link to F-Zero Wiki in infoboxes (i.e. Captain Falcon, Samurai Goroh, etc.), or should this wait until they're a full member? Miles (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2011 (EDT)

If we already added these links, and they are certain to become a member, I don't really see the use in removing the links only to have to add them again later. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 18:40, 14 September 2011 (EDT)
We haven't yet; that's what I'm asking about. Miles (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2011 (EDT)
Personally I think infobox linking should be reserved for full members. Toomai Glittershine ??? The Obfuscating 20:44, 14 September 2011 (EDT)

Spacer cells[edit]

Would it be okay if I take out the two spacer cells in the bottom corners? Without those, it'd be possible to allow smaller screens to put fewer links side by side, instead of overflowing at 500px. Should even be able to unhide the icons on mobile and make it pretty again. ライケン Rigel Kent (talk) 04:54, 3 August 2016 (EDT)

The entire point of this template is to have a fixed amount of rows with a fixed amount of equally-sized cells in each, and historically the userbase has preferred spacer cells in empty table corners. Toomai Glittershine ??? The Keymaster 09:45, 3 August 2016 (EDT)