User talk:Air Conditioner/Archive 2

Archives		Start	End
Archive 1	Who Are You?	March 2, 2012, 5:24 PM	December 4, 2012, 8:10 PM
Archive 2	Ignoreland	December 4, 2012, 8:11 PM	January 27, 2013, 9:02 AM
Current	Tomorrow Never Knows	January 27, 2013, 9:03 AM	?????????????????????????

(No title given)

I'm not good at this talk page thing :\ Do I reply here, or my own page? I've already replied on my page, just in case. Mesuxelf 10:42, 9 December 2012 (EST)

Please reply on your own talk page. Also, your new image is also quite disruptive. Air Conditioner All together now! 10:49, 9 December 2012 (EST)

So someone told you they cheated in Mafia, eh?

I'd be interested to have a more thorough explanation next time you're on IRC (if you have one). Toomai Glittershine The Interspacial 18:07, 11 December 2012 (EST)

Since I do not have access to IRC at this time, I will explain it here. On another channel that Toast, theweirdomaxim and I all frequent, theweirdomaxim had an "Aha!" moment. Only problem: He was dead, and Toast, Havoc and JamesHeart were the only people left in the game. Theweirdomaxim pointed out that I had tried to lynch Havoc several times to Toast, which ultimately led to Toast lynching JamesHeart. Later, I realized that this was technically cheating. I then confronted theweirdomaxim, who said, "Yeah... I guess I did cheat... sorry about that," implying that he now understands it's against the rules and will not do it again. Air Conditioner My edit count 19:08, 11 December 2012 (EST)

???

What joke of yours did I steal? Smash Master 15:38, 13 December 2012 (EST)

Ahem. Air Conditioner ばか. 17:03, 13 December 2012 (EST)

Big deal. >_> Smash Master 17:30, 13 December 2012 (EST)

Hey, you asked. Air Conditioner Jai guru deva om. 17:33, 13 December 2012 (EST)

Is that Japanese text referring to me? Smash Master 20:39, 20 December 2012 (EST)

It's randomly selected from 69 different choices. Air Conditioner Maybe I'm crazy... 20:43, 20 December 2012 (EST)

Cleanup tags

Never remove them just because the person who added it didn't include a reason. If the lack of a reason bothers you, read the page and put the reason in yourself, don't remove the tag from a page that legitimately needs cleanup. Any edits of yours that were rollbacked from me are because of you removing a legitimate cleanup tag. Omega Tyrant 03:20, 18 December 2012 (EST)

Okay, but for a lot of them, I legitimately didn't see much need for cleanup. Some articles were a bit stubby, maybe, or a bit incomplete, but there are separate tags for that. For example, a lot of tags I didn't remove that were later removed by others were kept because I saw that it really needed cleanup. I'll admit that some of my edits were in the wrong, but in some others, I explained my rationale, in yet more, I just didn't see any reason for cleanup, and in still others, I was just changing an incorrect tag. I'm not trying to avoid responsibility, but I would like an explanation of why those particular edits were reverted. Air Conditioner is your friendly neighborhood psychopath 15:00, 18 December 2012 (EST)

You didn't explain why the first one didn't need the cleanup tag, just saying "it doesn't need clean up" is not reasoning. Information being poorly organised (as the "squished together" means) is certainly something that needs cleaning up. Just because you're unable to fix it doesn't mean the page doesn't need cleaning up.

The second one, there's banter within the article that isn't really relevant, improper tense, results are not in proper format, and the ruleset is missing stuff (such as the legal counterpick stages).

The third one, notice how the tag explicitly states it's poorly written. The information there is messy and poorly organised, and should be put into table format.

Also, don't use rollover to say stuff in talk page posts. I didn't even noticed you had more to say until I went to edit here, and it just complicates seeing what you had to say. Omega Tyrant 02:31, 19 December 2012 (EST)

I wanted to ask you something

If I remember correctly, you have said before that you could only be on IRC at specific times, right? But I kinda forgot them and I sometimes wonder if you would come on #sw or not, so maybe you can clear it up for me? Thanks in advance, PSIWolf The one and only! 11:00, 24 December 2012 (EST)

Due to my astoundingly shitty internet, I cannot access IRC on this computer. However, it's winter break now, and I will be on more frequently through my other computer. Usually, I'm on at 7PM EST during weekends, so obviously you can't come on then. However, thanks to winter break, when I'm on is now very unpredictable. Air Conditioner Tomorrow never knows. 11:02, 24 December 2012 (EST)

Oh. So to make along story short it would be that you are on at times I'm asleep? Greeeat...-- PSIWolf The one and only! 11:05, 24 December 2012 (EST)

And also some other times, such as right now. :D Air Conditioner is the incompetent Brawler 11:20, 24 December 2012 (EST)

Appealing my block

I frankly believe that I was unfairly blocked. For one thing, when Toomai blocked me and Bandit, Omega Tyrant already had the entire thing under control. Second, I was not violating any policy, including SW:NPA, as OT stated. Cursing is not a blockable offense. Thirdly, there was no warning given at all before the block. While I realize that giving a warning is not set in stone, because SW:BLOCK is a guideline, not a policy, I most definitely feel like a warning should have been given in this situation. (In addition, "unnecessarily rude comments" is quite vague, I'm still not 100% sure what exactly I was blocked for.) Air Conditioner *cue dramatic music* 09:09, 31 December 2012 (EST)

Well, to quote OT, "someone lightheartedly vandalising a userpage of yours that you could easily revert is hardly reason to rage at them". And you went a little overboard with that rage. I of course can't know what Toomai thought if it, that's true. For the warning thing, you just gave no valid argument. To be precise, you actually contradicted yourself there by saying "While I realize that giving a warning is not set in stone, because SW:BLOCK is a guideline, not a policy...".-- PSIWolf The one and only! 09:24, 31 December 2012 (EST)

Warnings should be given in situations like this. This is something very minor, and a warning would have easily been sufficient. After that, I said that I still felt like a warning should have been given; after all, OT already had the thing under control, so a block was unnecessary. Try to read the whole thing, please. Air Conditioner is your friendly neighborhood psychopath 09:29, 31 December 2012 (EST)