Talk:Water (type): Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→FLUDD and Water Gun: new section) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
If neither do damage, how can they have a role in type effectiveness? [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 23:42, 12 January 2011 (EST) | If neither do damage, how can they have a role in type effectiveness? [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 23:42, 12 January 2011 (EST) | ||
:Actually, Water Gun can do damage. When it is uncharged, it is a short range multi-hitting attack that can do 12% total. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 00:03, 13 January 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 01:03, January 13, 2011
So, unlike other effects like Flame and Darkness, the Water effect isn't clear to inherit this page (as it's currently being used as a disambig). Not only that, but Water is also a type (like Arm, Leg, and Body are), so there's an argument for having TWO pages: Water (type) and Water (effect) (although both would be short enough it'd be feasible to have them on the same page). Thoughts? Toomai Glittershine 
11:05, 4 December 2010 (EST)
- Seeing as only four pages link to here, I'll make this page about the type and effect. Toomai Glittershine The Bold 20:58, 26 December 2010 (EST)
FLUDD and Water Gun
If neither do damage, how can they have a role in type effectiveness? Mr. Anon (talk) 23:42, 12 January 2011 (EST)
