Talk:Crush

Wait a minute

I clearly saw Villager get crushed by Midgar forming back together in the presentation. Is that not a crushing effect, or...? Aidan, the Jolly Space Warrior 22:54, 15 December 2015 (EST)

I'd count it. Disaster Flare (talk) 22:54, 15 December 2015 (EST)

No, but see, here's the thing: in Brawl, Pirate Ship had a crushing effect, but in Wii U, it doesn't. So either crushing doesn't exist altogether and the stage uses the hitbox from something like the Orne, or crushing exists solely on Midgar. Aidan, the Jolly Space Warrior 22:57, 15 December 2015 (EST)

Hmm...I'd check myself, but A: I don't have Cloud and won't be able to get him until after Christmas, and B: I don't know how to hack the game so. Disaster Flare (talk) 22:58, 15 December 2015 (EST)

Definitely counts; a rewrite to that effect should be implemented. Miles (talk) 23:07, 15 December 2015 (EST)

I'll add a cleanup tag for it, as I don't have the time to do it right now. Disaster Flare (talk) 23:08, 15 December 2015 (EST)

Move proposal

Strong oppose. This is again the name of a feature and renaming the article is not only incredibly moot, but probably also pointless as well. At this rate, I'll be able to copy and paste these talk page posts. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 18:51, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Strong oppose per BV. Don't even see why this would be an issue. Aidan, the Rurouni 18:59, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Never dismiss anything as being "pointless" or "not an issue" without other valid reasons, seemingly minor things should not be ignored if they would make the wiki better. The very first line of the article refers to the topic as "crushing" anyways, which seems to suggest that "Crushing" would be a better title for the article. In addition, every article referring to an action is written in the "-ing" form: Camping instead of Camp, Turtling instead of Turtle, Edgeguarding instead of Edgeguard. Awesome Cardinal 2000 20:19, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Oppose. Why even... St. Reggie, Leprachaun 23:44, 27 February 2018 (EST)

Oppose-leaning neutral. It’s really kind of useless to even make a big deal out of changing the name of an article to a redirect right to it. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 21:06, 8 March 2018 (EST)

"There's already a redirect" is not a valid reason. If an article would have a better title, it should be moved, regardless if the title already existed as a redirect. Awesome Cardinal 2000 21:29, 8 March 2018 (EST)

[1] The MoS states that titles should be nouns opposed to verbs. According to this dictionary definition, the word "crush" as a noun has two definitions: an infatuation for someone else, or a mob of people. The word "Crush" here applies to neither of these definitions as a noun. Awesome Cardinal 2000 21:59, 8 March 2018 (EST)

Will you please stop, Ac2k? Nobody cares, and nobody wants to move it. At this point the move tags are a nuisance. St. Reggie, the Iron Leprachaun Warrior 04:21, 11 March 2018 (EDT)

Calm yourself, Iron. This is not adding to the discussion and will only serve to create conflict. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 04:37, 11 March 2018 (EDT)

Sorry. St. Reggie, the Iron Leprachaun Warrior 04:51, 11 March 2018 (EDT)

Gonna now push to close this proposal as failed if nobody has anything else to say. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 20:42, 14 March 2018 (EDT)

Care to respond to the dictionary example that I linked instead of doing the same thing you've been doing countless times already? Awesome Cardinal 2000 13:56, 15 March 2018 (EDT)

Care to stop gravedigging discussions that have been closed or edit warring? Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 19:02, 15 March 2018 (EDT)

That's a blatant ad hominem, stop calling this "gravedigging" when this discussion was never a closed discussion in the first place. You were the one who posted who made the original push to close it as failed, so if you want to go by that logic, you were the one who was "gravedigging" it in the first place. And what I did on the other page has absolutely nothing to do with this current discussion.

If you want to close the discussion, why not respond to what I said about how article titles should be nouns according to the MoS, or how the word "Crush" being used here does not fit any of the dictionary definitions for the word "crush" as a noun, or how the entire article uses the word "Crushing" instead of "Crush"? If you're right, I'll back down/agree with you, and you'll actually have a claim to being right, rather than "I'm going to push for my way while simultaneously refusing to discuss it at the same time." Awesome Cardinal 2000 13:15, 16 March 2018 (EDT)