Talk:Clone/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Archiving)
Line 12: Line 12:
:Clone-ness is transitive. So if Fox and Falco are semiclones, and Fox and Wolf are semiclones, then Falco and Wolf are semiclones. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The SMASH-GINEER 08:49, 14 July 2011 (EDT)
:Clone-ness is transitive. So if Fox and Falco are semiclones, and Fox and Wolf are semiclones, then Falco and Wolf are semiclones. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The SMASH-GINEER 08:49, 14 July 2011 (EDT)
::So try to make the reader do the logical thinking by him/herself?.... sounds fine to me i guess[[User:Lucasthefourth|<span style="color:red">''Lucas-IV- '']]</span> [[User: Lucasthefourth/Challenge|''Try'']] [[Special:Contributions/Lucasthefourth|'''to''']] [[User talk:Lucasthefourth|''Talk'']] [[Image:Lucas alive.PNG|25px]] 08:57, 14 July 2011 (EDT)
::So try to make the reader do the logical thinking by him/herself?.... sounds fine to me i guess[[User:Lucasthefourth|<span style="color:red">''Lucas-IV- '']]</span> [[User: Lucasthefourth/Challenge|''Try'']] [[Special:Contributions/Lucasthefourth|'''to''']] [[User talk:Lucasthefourth|''Talk'']] [[Image:Lucas alive.PNG|25px]] 08:57, 14 July 2011 (EDT)
== Is it really necessary... ==
To have a note saying some people consider Lucario and Mewtwo "semi-clones", just because one move is similar? If we did that, we might as well as have Roy and Ike there as "semi-clones" (neutral special), Bowser and Charizard (neutral special again), Mario and Yoshi (up smash, neutral aerial, forward aerial), etc. Also, I say Fox and Wolf would fit a note section, rather than actually being listed as semi-clones (they only have three specials similar in function and name, with the rest of their movesets being completely different, as well as not so similar physics). <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 18:59, 7 August 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:59, August 7, 2011

Archives
Archives

1 2

what about

Falco and wolf?Lucas-IV- Try to Talk Lucas alive.PNG 07:33, 14 July 2011 (EDT)

Clone-ness is transitive. So if Fox and Falco are semiclones, and Fox and Wolf are semiclones, then Falco and Wolf are semiclones. Toomai Glittershine ??? The SMASH-GINEER 08:49, 14 July 2011 (EDT)
So try to make the reader do the logical thinking by him/herself?.... sounds fine to me i guessLucas-IV- Try to Talk Lucas alive.PNG 08:57, 14 July 2011 (EDT)

Is it really necessary...

To have a note saying some people consider Lucario and Mewtwo "semi-clones", just because one move is similar? If we did that, we might as well as have Roy and Ike there as "semi-clones" (neutral special), Bowser and Charizard (neutral special again), Mario and Yoshi (up smash, neutral aerial, forward aerial), etc. Also, I say Fox and Wolf would fit a note section, rather than actually being listed as semi-clones (they only have three specials similar in function and name, with the rest of their movesets being completely different, as well as not so similar physics). Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 18:59, 7 August 2011 (EDT)