SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Toomai (2)

Toomai (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
Alright, let's give this another go. My previous attempt at adminship died was struck down was rejected was eaten by Void failed almost a year ago, and I think it's time I exact revenge have another try. So I guess I'll start out with a list of my strong points:

• I'm on here a lot. Like, never-misses-a-single-edit a lot. On some days, I can be online almost the entire day (in terms of my schedule being open).
• I know stuff about Smash Bros. And if I don't know it, I do the research. (Okay, so I've done no testing in a while. Learning C, finite automatons, linear algebra, and calculus all at the same time will do that to you. But I intend to get back into it sooner than later.)
• I have never trolled or flamed. Go ahead, look it up.
• I care for this wiki so much that I designed a new logo for it. (Yuck, that was cheesy.)
• I stick to the facts and use srsbsns when necessary.
• Not a single regular contributor has any issues with me. (If you do, then let me know. Also give me your address so I can send you a certificate confirming you do not exist cookie. Disclaimer: May be eaten by Mailyoshis en route.)

However, in the interest of fair play, I will also provide a list of my downfalls.

• I'm in the Eastern timezone just like most of the other admins.
• On some days, I have almost seven straight hours of class.
• I am bad at user disputes, mostly because I am unable to puzzle out when the best time to enter a conversation is. (Note: At least one user believes this point to be false.)
• I sometimes try too hard to introduce nomenclature. (Examples include Quark Mines and amaranthine gas, as well as the Final Smash categories.)
• I often try too hard to be neutral. (Example: This list.)

So, users, do your thing. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic · The Stats Guy · The Table Designer 02:46, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support

1. Support - Good faith and constructive edits, you've made improvements to articles such as the tier list, and you've introduced very organized templates and styles of editing. You have my full support. Blue Ninjakoopa 02:56, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
2. Supportz. Pretty darn good contributor, A TON of overwhelming power a few extra buttons won't hurt when doing more template projects in the future, especially when SBB4 come out. HavocReaper48 03:08, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
3. Support. If nothing else, Toomai would be an excellent janitorial mod (I've seen many a spam article tagged for deletion). Even if he doesn't specifically help with user issues, he'd stay out of the way. That's one positive and one neutral factor in my decision, hence the resolution of my thoughts being support. Miles (talk) 03:54, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

1. ...

Neutral

1. Neutral, leaning to support I think you are definitely capable of being an admin, but first I would like to see why you want admin powers. After you give the reasons you want adminship, I will pledge my fullest support. 98.117.158.220 05:02, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

---