SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/KoRoBeNiKi: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision: pages) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Rfa close|failed}} | |||
===KoRoBeNiKi=== | ===KoRoBeNiKi=== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Oppose''' Don't see a need at this time. Per above votes --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] 06:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | *'''Oppose''' Don't see a need at this time. Per above votes --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] 06:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:02, February 2, 2012
 |
The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. |
 |
This RfA was closed as failed. | |
| Reason: | No reason given. | |
KoRoBeNiKi
Hello. This is KoRoBeNiKi. I wish to become an Admin on here after all that I have done for smash 64 moves and all smash 64 and melee stuff. I wish to become an admin to help get rid of vandals and get rid of combos that do not exist. I wish to be able to report combos that do not work because it is possible to get out of most combos in these games. I wish to be able to furthur my contributions and the "pro" scene of smash. Other good points is that I have never been banned from Any Board whatsoever. I am also a very old member of this wonderful site going back to the time when brawl was not even known about (before when it was just smashwiki). I added starting percentages for characters of smash 64 and I only will change when I am completely sure that I am right. I have been here from the time of character moves not being there for anyone correctly in smash 64 and not even everyone in melee. I have had trobule with editing in the beginning but now I am completely fine with this. Furthermore, I believe that I am responsible enough to hold such an honor. 20:02, 29 May 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoRoBeNiKi (talk • contribs)
- Neutral Leaning Ever-So-Slightly Towards Support. I read your statement and was GOING to say support but... YOU SHOULD HAVE SIGNED YOUR USERNAME XD Kperfekt722 (talk) 10:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Opposition Don't look so good when you don't even sign your own request. Also, I note many of your contributions are sparse, and marked by large periods of inactivity. Committment, sir, committment.Semicolon (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - Essentially, the above, but only felt moreso by me. --Sky (t · c · w) 03:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Im sorry who are you again? Zmario (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't see a need at this time. Per above votes --Charitwo 06:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
