Talk:Prima Games: Difference between revisions
(→Delete) |
MuteSpittah (talk | contribs) (→Delete) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::::::That makes sense. That just means we shouldn't reference its inaccurate information. If there's ever something from Prima that is accurate and we want to reference it, it can still be referenced. Right? [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 15:52, 10 April 2016 (EDT) | ::::::That makes sense. That just means we shouldn't reference its inaccurate information. If there's ever something from Prima that is accurate and we want to reference it, it can still be referenced. Right? [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 15:52, 10 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
<small>(reset indent)</small> That I wouldn't know. Just so I'm clear, I'm '''neutral''' about this whole deal, so I'm not the best person to be asking about Prima's fate on the wiki. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Green; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:Blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px blue">'''Flare'''</span>]] [[File:Disaster Flare signature image.png|20px]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:SkyBlue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px skyblue">(talk)</span>]]'' 15:55, 10 April 2016 (EDT) | <small>(reset indent)</small> That I wouldn't know. Just so I'm clear, I'm '''neutral''' about this whole deal, so I'm not the best person to be asking about Prima's fate on the wiki. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Green; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:Blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px blue">'''Flare'''</span>]] [[File:Disaster Flare signature image.png|20px]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:SkyBlue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px skyblue">(talk)</span>]]'' 15:55, 10 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Yeah. Well just because a source is inaccurate on certain things doesn't mean it's inaccurate on other things, hence why I don't understand why it's "not allowed to be referenced." [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 15:58, 10 April 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:58, April 10, 2016
Discuss. I'm not sure what I think yet. --RoyboyX Talk 20:18, 20 March 2013 (EDT)
Prima Games are more important than "any other game guide maker", as they make the official guides for the Super Smash Bros. games. Keep. Toast 
ltimatum
22:33, 20 March 2013 (EDT)
Prima Games game guides are the most notable guides for the Smash Bros. games so I'm agreeing with Toast. Keep. Dots 
The 90's 22:35, 20 March 2013 (EDT)
Keep Ignoring their "official" status, these guides are really infamous among the Smash community. Omega Tyrant 
23:17, 20 March 2013 (EDT)
Keep For reasons stated above. --RoyboyX Talk 08:23, 21 March 2013 (EDT)
Delete
Given that Prima is now not allowed to be referenced (be it trivia, move names, etc) and that it's been outcasted by SW:OFFICIAL, I'd say we could stand to loose this page. However, discuss. Serpent 
King 00:37, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- Are there any other notable Smash strategy guides/player's guides in print? We could merge this into a page on that subject more generally if so. Miles (talk) 01:14, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- To answer your question, yes. Nintendo has approved the creation and distribution of a Smash 64 guide by Brady Games and a Melee guide by Nintendo Power. Additionally, "special editions" of Smash guides have been released as well. With all this content, an official guide book article should be created. To add even more content, a "mistakes and errors" section could be added. Pokebub (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- Why is Prima not allowed to be referenced? MuteSpittah (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- Most likely because of it's inaccurate information and lesser-known terms for some features/techniques. Pokebub (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- ^Exactly the reason. Its information can be so inaccurate it's unreliable, hence why we don't use it for references and trivia. Disaster Flare
(talk) 15:45, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- That makes sense. That just means we shouldn't reference its inaccurate information. If there's ever something from Prima that is accurate and we want to reference it, it can still be referenced. Right? MuteSpittah (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- ^Exactly the reason. Its information can be so inaccurate it's unreliable, hence why we don't use it for references and trivia. Disaster Flare
- Most likely because of it's inaccurate information and lesser-known terms for some features/techniques. Pokebub (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- Why is Prima not allowed to be referenced? MuteSpittah (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- To answer your question, yes. Nintendo has approved the creation and distribution of a Smash 64 guide by Brady Games and a Melee guide by Nintendo Power. Additionally, "special editions" of Smash guides have been released as well. With all this content, an official guide book article should be created. To add even more content, a "mistakes and errors" section could be added. Pokebub (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
(reset indent) That I wouldn't know. Just so I'm clear, I'm neutral about this whole deal, so I'm not the best person to be asking about Prima's fate on the wiki. Disaster Flare 
(talk) 15:55, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
- Yeah. Well just because a source is inaccurate on certain things doesn't mean it's inaccurate on other things, hence why I don't understand why it's "not allowed to be referenced." MuteSpittah (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2016 (EDT)
