User talk:Mr. Anon/Archive 2

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

o_O

Yo, 98.117! Nice to see you made your own account now! Make a userpage and whatever, now you have a billion more rights than IPs a username! Hey, you want me to design a custom sig like mine for you? --HavocReaper'48 23:01, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Mr. Anon (talk) 23:53, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

So Mr.Anon going to be your username name 98? Well happy birthday. Omega Tyrant 00:05, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats!

You finally got rollback! Yesh! I have to say, you (technically) hold the record for lowest amount of contributions to receive rollback. Heh, I got mine at a bit past 100, I think. (Remember: Use rollback only if clearly vandalism). Again, congrats! --HavoCreaper'48 23:49, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Warning template

When you use the warning template, make sure to subset it, i.e. {{subst:Warning|Crazy Hand}}. This allows it to sign your post as well as reads better when someone else edits the page. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 20:36, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

I hate to say this but...

You are not a mod. Please stop trying to act like one. And if you do, please read the policies that you are attempting to enforce and figure out if they actually apply to the situation. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 20:50, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

I have read the policy. I've been here for over 6 months, and I know them well. #6 on "What not to do" clearly states not to get into a debate with a vandal or a troll. Please stop acting like I'm a moron and that I know nothing about the policies. Mr. Anon (talk) 21:04, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Bridge of Eldin's fallout

I came across this page and I noticed that on the talk page you said you could provide videos of this glitch. Can you still provide a link to a video confirming this glitch? Omega Tyrant 18:00, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0vCmWDLyrE. Mr. Anon teh awsome 18:11, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

While that video did show a zooming glitch I was not aware of, it did not show the glitch mentioned in the article. As such, is the article supposed to be about a different glitch or did you link me to the wrong video? Omega Tyrant 18:30, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. Maybe I misread the article and thought that it refered to some of the glitches in that video. Mr. Anon teh awsome 18:34, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

So you can't provide a video of the glitch? Omega Tyrant 18:47, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Apparently, no. Sorry. Mr. Anon teh awsome 19:23, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I'll have to tag the page for deletion then. If I'm unable to do the glitch and no one brings up proof of it, I'll delete it. Omega Tyrant 19:35, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Do you mean this one:It's over 9000!!! 04:16, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

In your signature you must make your username clear so that people will know who you are. As such, you must change your signature. Omega Tyrant 04:24, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

How about now:Moon the Hedgehog is a WikiKnight! 10:33, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

The only links you can have in your sig are to your userpage, talk page, edit count, or contributions on this wiki. Other than that it's fine. Dr. Pain 99 Talk 14:57, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

The out-link in that signature is fine because he is an admin on the wiki it links to (I believe). Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 02:25, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

No, he's not. I checked. Mr. Anon teh awsome 02:28, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Would care to explain why you used rollback here? Omega Tyrant 02:35, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

All of the user's edits seemed unncecessary. I was going to revert but then I realized that the user had made previous edits to the page. Sorry it didn't seem clear. Anon 04:36, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

SW:1RV

One of the reasons your RfA failed is because of your lack of understanding of our policies. You aren't supposed to undo an undo. DP99 (CTE) 04:44, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Again, you are violating this policy. Please stop. DP99 (CTE) 17:58, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because you did not give a reason for it. Sir Anon the great 18:01, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't give a reason, my iPod is really glitchy. But that doesn't matter, you still don't undo an undo. And we haven't discussed this about the skill levels, so for now they should be kept. DP99 (CTE) 18:03, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

The thing is, there really isn't any opposition, so I assumed that there was no harm making the edits. Mr. Anon teh awsome 18:09, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Another thing is, while I'm not saying that I shouldn't have reverted more than once, keep in mind that many previous users have done the same thing, and some of them are now admins. Also, it says in the policy not to revert people who break the rule, but bring it up on the talk page, which you yourself did. Sir Anon the great 21:27, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

I do not like the, "it's ok to break the rules because someone else did" mentality. That will not help to get me to support future RfAs. I know what the rule says, and I brought it up on your talk page and IRC before I reverted your revert. Plus I got permission from a Sysop (OT) to do so. DP99 (CTE) 21:32, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

I did not say that what I did was OK. I'm saying that it annoys me when you go like "You can't be an admin because you broke this one minor rule". I get it. I also agree that for now they should be kept until other users give their opinions. I don't want to break our friendship by arguing about this stuff. Sir Anon the great 21:40, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad that you understand that what you did was wrong, that's all I wanted. And I'm not trying to say you can't be an admin because you broke this one minor rule; I'm only trying to say don't do a lot of stuff like this. I'm not trying to badger you, I'm only trying to help, and I understand that all users make mistakes.

I have two personalities, on SW, I'm serious and either emotionless or angry. My other personality I use on IRC, and that one is goofy and playful. What happens to one personality will not effect the other, so I will not break our friendship over these disputes. :) DP99 (CTE) 21:52, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I got angry earlyier, and thanks for explaining. Sir Anon the great 21:58, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

I forgive you, and you're welcome. DP99 (CTE) 22:00, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Smasher skill level

Why are you so convinced that skill level doesn't matter for smasher articles? Toomai Glittershine The Table Designer 17:49, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Well this is an encyclopedia, and adding skill levels is like adding an opinion, since they aren't measureable. Mr. Anon teh awsome 17:50, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough, but shouldn't you be discussing somewhere whether to remove them, instead of just removing them with little explanation? Toomai Glittershine The Table Designer 17:52, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Well on the smasherbeta page I explained why I was removing it, and I thought there were policies that already explained this. Sir Anon the great 17:53, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Smasherbeta isn't the best place for that, it's over here: SmashWiki:Smasher Project. I suggest you make a new section on that talk page before removing any more skill levels. Toomai Glittershine The Stats Guy 17:56, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

D v. Delete

Please learn the difference between the tags; "d" let's an admin know that the page is spam and needs to be immediately removed from the mainspace, while "delete" let's him or her know that the deletion needs to be discussed and determined by consensus. That page was obviously spam, thus not meriting discussion over its removal. BNK ^[E|T|C] 02:23, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Except the page wasn't spam. That template is only supposed to be used for vandalism. Please stop acting like I'm a moron. Mr. Anon teh awsome 04:01, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Starmen.net

Dude, I saw what you wrote on BNK's user page, and I'll tell you who I am. In fact, you know who I am.

I am PKRok. ParaGoomba348 01:14, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

1

Admins don't settle content disputes; they only settle user disputes if it's necessary. Shadowcrest 21:33, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Ok then. Sir Anon the great 23:45, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Eruption

A stage 8 Eruption is an OHKO on the majority of the cast and you are either testing it wrong or testing it in Training Mode. A stage 8 Eruption will do 39% with vertical knockback. If you were not in training mode and was failing to OHKO the enemy, you were either landing a stage 7 Eruption, a fully charged Eruption, or was testing it only on the few characters that can survive it at 0%. Now if you actually test this properly against those not listed that can survive it, you will clearly see that a stage 8 Eruption is in fact an OHKO. Omega Tyrant 06:12, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

2

Could you explain why you attempted to rollback this message on the Aura Storm talk page when the message while lacking professional tone, still pertained to the content of the article? Omega Tyrant 07:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

The message was spam, so I removed it. While generic comments are not to be removed, spam is, so I removed it. Sir Anon the great 15:30, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Even if a talk page edit is spam, you should still leave it for reference. Doctor Pain 99 (CTE) 15:32, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Quoting Toomai:"Many users agree that no one should ever remove non-spam comments from talk pages (even your own), without exception. This is considered an unwritten rule by many." As there is no written rule about the not removing comments thing (as far as I know), I assumed that the above statement was the unwritten rule. Mr. Anon teh awsome 15:37, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Did you actually read the message? The IP was asking if a piece trivia was necessary, which means the message pertained to the content of the article, which messages on talk pages are supposed to do. As I said in my last post, it was written in a non professional tone, but it still pertained to the content of the article, which means there was no reason for you to rollback it. It was certainly not spam. Omega Tyrant 15:40, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I must have misinterpreted it as spam. Sorry about that. Mr. Anon teh awsome 16:41, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't fault you for removing it. It looked a lot like a spam message to me as well. But I think the general rule of thumb is if there is any content to the post beyond "buy cheap Viagra online" let it stay and just let an admin know about it. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 17:17, September 3, 2010 (UTC)