SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/ZeldaStarfoxfan2164

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talkcontribsedit countRFA page)[edit]

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
With the recent vandal attacks, I’m aware that there’s only two active admins available. Most vandals attack when neither admin appear on the “who’s online” section so I feel it’s time to step up security. I always have SmashWiki on my browser and check the recent changes often and see if the edits were proper. Over the past few days, I’ve kept this wiki up to date by creating a lot of pages for ‘’Super Smash Bros. for Wii U’’ event matches and added the text for the Orbital Gate Assault conversation. It’s over one year since I first joined SmashWiki and over those years; I’ve understood most of the Wiki policies and friendlily reminded users of these policies. If anyone has any concerns, let me know, Thanks for your cooperation. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is a never lover boy 20:56, 19 November 2014 (EST)

Support[edit]

  1. ...

Oppose[edit]

  1. ...

Neutral[edit]

  1. ...

Comments[edit]

If you were an admin, what would you would do different as an admin than what you do now? Rtzxy Image for my signature (and before you say it's too large, I'm going to resize it as [[|20px]]. Reflect! 21:16, 19 November 2014 (EST)

I'm online a lot so when I notice a vandal, I can take care of it. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is a never lover boy 21:25, 19 November 2014 (EST)

The responsibility of adminship goes a lot farther than simply being able to ban vandals on sight. That's not the only reason why you should be running; this role holds a lot of weight and requires significant decision-making and dispute-solving skills. Can you name specific things that you plan to do with your admin tools, if you were to get them, other than banning nonconstructive accounts? --Timson622222 (talk) 21:29, 19 November 2014 (EST)

Just like how I remind users of policies, I'd direct them to my talk page, or the talk page of the subject and listen to both arguments and research the subject further. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is made in America 21:37, 19 November 2014 (EST)
Just wondering. Are there any good examples of your dispute handling and decision making? Dots (talk) For Dots' signature The Mewtwo 21:53, 19 November 2014 (EST)
I've been looking over Miles's and OT's arguments that took almost a year ago, one had an argument over the name of one of an article, I'd say, since SmashWiki is not official and it's not censored, I'd say the name should be left alone. Like Toomai, I'd say just move on. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is a never lover boy 22:02, 19 November 2014 (EST)
Hmm I see... I was wondering what kind of good decisions did you make for the wiki. Like are your thoughts and actions influential to SmashWiki? Dots (talk) For Dots' signature The SNES 22:08, 19 November 2014 (EST)
The only problem I'm seeing is that even though I'm online a lot, I rarely found any arguments between regular users. It will also depending on the subject though. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is made in America 22:17, 19 November 2014 (EST)
Well uh. How about you link me some examples. Dots (talk) For Dots' signature The GameCube 22:21, 19 November 2014 (EST)
Okay, I think I've been asked too many questions so I'm asking Toomai to withdraw this RfA. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is made in America 22:25, 19 November 2014 (EST)
Wait how come? All that I asked is to give some more support for your dispute handling. I never said it was lacking or bad. Dots (talk) For Dots' signature The Gangnum Style 22:29, 19 November 2014 (EST)
Okay, I admit when I see an edit war, most of the times, I let an admin handle it rather than getting into the discussion and sometimes users may be like, "You're not an admin, mind your own business!" ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is bad for me 22:33, 19 November 2014 (EST)