Forum:Massive SmashWiki To-do List

Forums: Index → Watercooler → Massive SmashWiki To-do List

I decided that theres should be a massive compiled to-do list for everything that needs doing on Smashwiki. Please cross things off (don't remove!) that have been completed, and add to this as necessary. Miles (talk) 20:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Master List

• Policy Updates and Composition
  • Passing SmashWiki:Trivia? (Passed) (additionally, the other three proposed policies: SmashWiki:Crew Pages, (Failed) SmashWiki:User Talk Page Guidelines (Passed), and SmashWiki:User pages (Failed))
  • Write a blog policy (Blogs disabled)
  • Update SmashWiki:Notability to include combos, techniques and glitches
• Templates That Need To Be Used More
  • {{trivia}}
  • {{notable}}
  • {{image}}
  • {{Infobox Enemy}}
  • {{controller}}
• Mini-Projects
  

Mini-projects are groups of articles that need improving but don't merit a full project themselves.

• • Change Pros/Cons to Attributes on all character articles, including Melee and N64
  • Cleanup moveset sections, write moveset sections for the Melee characters.
  • Change the Changes from Melee to Brawl sections from bullet from to paragraph form
  • Integrate pros and cons of Brawl fighters' Attributes
  • HP for enemies
  • Trophy lists
  • Completing this
  • Controller and button articles need major expansion
  • Cleaning up pages in here.

be bold

Why are we encouraging people to tag things with a template rather than telling them to clean it up themselves? Shadowcrest 23:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Better the former than neither. Miles (talk) 01:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Do we really need to use a forum topic for this? You should use a project page like the Post-Merge Cleanup. - Hatake91 (talk) 12:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Forums allow for the discussion to take place right on the same page- I rather like the style, actually. Once we iron out all the disagreements and such, we can write a project page or something.

At Miles, just barely. Telling people to tag things gives them a sense that they're helping, when really they're barely doing anything. We don't have a shortage of users who are willing to tag sections for cleanup- we have a shortage of users who are willing to actually do the cleanup. Unless you are volunteering to take on this monumental task (kudos if you are- I know I'm too lazy to), I would recommend against this course of action. Shadowcrest 15:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I try to when I can, but it's daunting. At least if they're tagging, though, they're helping out those who do have the initiative to do such overhaul edits. Miles (talk) 22:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Anyone else notice

That less than half of the Melee fighter pages have movesets listed?L33t Silvie ^{I see wat u did thar...}

Done, did the remaining ones all by myself. --HavocReaper'48 03:02, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Movesets = moveset tables?

You've noted both "cleanup moveset sections" and "completing [the moveset tables]". Would it be good if I put each table into the character articles once complete? Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic cntrbs 02:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I think this needs to be revived

There's a whole SmashWiki to-do list here which is kind-of abandoned now. I think it would be more useful if we made it more current to keep track of newer problems. For example, the proposed policies which have been abandoned / yet to be passed have to be looked at and updated. There are many other things, but Miles' list sums it all up. Now, any thoughts? RAN1 04:16, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

My new Smasher Policy, for one. Sir Anon the great 04:37, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Update

A major thing we need to take care of are the pages that should be merged, most of which have had no discussion at all. Mr. Anontalk 17:19, 5 August 2012 (EDT)