Talk:Toon Zelda & Sheik: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision: pages) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (→Deletion: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I don't understand why that keeps getting re-added to this article. First, it's an abuse of the tag. [[Template:Speculation|Look at the template]]. Obviously it's only meant for pre-launch speculation. True, there's no mention of this on the DOJO, but since we're no longer reliant on the DOJO for information, that's irrelevant. Second, if you still insist on complaining that it's not sourced (just like, you know, 99% of the stuff on the wiki), then don't leave it to everyone else to guess what snippets exactly you take issue with. The crap people used to have on this page about how "OMG u can downlaod them 2 ur wiii" was bullshit, but that's not there anymore, so that can't be the issue. So what is? Is it the first paragraph--the one you could verify by looking at, say, [http://www.destructoid.com/rumortoid-a-full-list-of-the-files-found-on-smash-bros-brawl-disk-update--68272.phtml the first result for "brawl disc files" in Google]? (If it bothers you so much that it's not linked in the article, then ''link it'' rather than dismiss it as untrue--and since you didn't even bother to ask on the talk page if it was true or not, I'm just going to assume you know it's true but are too lazy to cite it?) Or are you complaining about the other two paragraphs, each of which explicitly qualify their contents as community speculation (and the second of which specifically strikes down the possibility of downloadable content)? Feel free to discuss, but I'm not up for guessing games, so don't mind me if I just decide to nuke the tag. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 22:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | I don't understand why that keeps getting re-added to this article. First, it's an abuse of the tag. [[Template:Speculation|Look at the template]]. Obviously it's only meant for pre-launch speculation. True, there's no mention of this on the DOJO, but since we're no longer reliant on the DOJO for information, that's irrelevant. Second, if you still insist on complaining that it's not sourced (just like, you know, 99% of the stuff on the wiki), then don't leave it to everyone else to guess what snippets exactly you take issue with. The crap people used to have on this page about how "OMG u can downlaod them 2 ur wiii" was bullshit, but that's not there anymore, so that can't be the issue. So what is? Is it the first paragraph--the one you could verify by looking at, say, [http://www.destructoid.com/rumortoid-a-full-list-of-the-files-found-on-smash-bros-brawl-disk-update--68272.phtml the first result for "brawl disc files" in Google]? (If it bothers you so much that it's not linked in the article, then ''link it'' rather than dismiss it as untrue--and since you didn't even bother to ask on the talk page if it was true or not, I'm just going to assume you know it's true but are too lazy to cite it?) Or are you complaining about the other two paragraphs, each of which explicitly qualify their contents as community speculation (and the second of which specifically strikes down the possibility of downloadable content)? Feel free to discuss, but I'm not up for guessing games, so don't mind me if I just decide to nuke the tag. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 22:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Deletion == | |||
'''Delete''' For the reason stated in the delete tag. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 22:46, 20 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:46, August 20, 2011
I know it states this in the article but, shouldn't tetra take shiek's place in this whole "toon" thing. There is no question that, that would be perfect. We shouldn't really mention shiek as "toon shiek". --2koolalex (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- But it's not proven, so we must assume that it would mirror Zelda and Sheik. --Shadowcrest 00:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Speculation tag
I don't understand why that keeps getting re-added to this article. First, it's an abuse of the tag. Look at the template. Obviously it's only meant for pre-launch speculation. True, there's no mention of this on the DOJO, but since we're no longer reliant on the DOJO for information, that's irrelevant. Second, if you still insist on complaining that it's not sourced (just like, you know, 99% of the stuff on the wiki), then don't leave it to everyone else to guess what snippets exactly you take issue with. The crap people used to have on this page about how "OMG u can downlaod them 2 ur wiii" was bullshit, but that's not there anymore, so that can't be the issue. So what is? Is it the first paragraph--the one you could verify by looking at, say, the first result for "brawl disc files" in Google? (If it bothers you so much that it's not linked in the article, then link it rather than dismiss it as untrue--and since you didn't even bother to ask on the talk page if it was true or not, I'm just going to assume you know it's true but are too lazy to cite it?) Or are you complaining about the other two paragraphs, each of which explicitly qualify their contents as community speculation (and the second of which specifically strikes down the possibility of downloadable content)? Feel free to discuss, but I'm not up for guessing games, so don't mind me if I just decide to nuke the tag. --Kirby King 22:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
Delete For the reason stated in the delete tag. Omega Tyrant 
22:46, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
