Talk:Pro Impact Players/Videography: Difference between revisions
(→Move) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I agree with the sub page concept. If there were to be a merge, half the Pro Impact page would just be video links. Keep encyclopedic information on one page, videos on the other. '''''[[User:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:maroon;">--Havoc</span>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:brown;">48</span>]]<span style="color:navy;"> >:D!!!</span>''''' 14:37, 27 October 2012 (EDT) | I agree with the sub page concept. If there were to be a merge, half the Pro Impact page would just be video links. Keep encyclopedic information on one page, videos on the other. '''''[[User:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:maroon;">--Havoc</span>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:brown;">48</span>]]<span style="color:navy;"> >:D!!!</span>''''' 14:37, 27 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
''No merge'' Pro-merge has no real argument for merging instead of having a subpage, while C. Hawk has one for he subpage. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 09:19, 28 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
===Merge=== | ===Merge=== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 41: | ||
We moved the article so we could continue discussing merge, so the move discussion is now off the table. No one has said anything about not merging other than Clarinet Hawk. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 14:23, 27 October 2012 (EDT) | We moved the article so we could continue discussing merge, so the move discussion is now off the table. No one has said anything about not merging other than Clarinet Hawk. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 14:23, 27 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
:C. Hawk's argument for moving to a subpage is a whole lot stronger than what you merge guys are putting up (which just essentially consists of "I think this should be merged"), as well as blindly accusing me of appealing to authority when I pointed out you guys haven't addressed him. Refute C. Hawk, or there will be no merge. | |||
Your argument also ignores how the videography section on the main page is for the most notable videos here. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 09:19, 28 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:19, October 28, 2012
Possible Move/Merge?
I believe this should be moved to Pro Impact Players/Videography or merged into the Pro Impact Players article. Please put your comments below. DarkFox01, ETC. 18:46, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
Move
Make it a sub-page. We have a selected Vidiogrpahy which gives the most notable videos, and this can be linked there as the comprehensive list. That is the most encyclopedic way to do it. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 19:15, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
I agree with the sub page concept. If there were to be a merge, half the Pro Impact page would just be video links. Keep encyclopedic information on one page, videos on the other. --Havoc48 >:D!!! 14:37, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
No merge Pro-merge has no real argument for merging instead of having a subpage, while C. Hawk has one for he subpage. Omega Tyrant 
09:19, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
Merge
This is essentially a list of links. It would best be merged with the Pro Impact Players article. Mousehunter321 (talk · contributions) 18:48, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
I think a merge would be best. Air Conditioner 
All you need is love! And $$$. 19:03, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
Merge per Mouse's points. --RoyboyX Talk 19:16, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
Considering there is a videography section on the Pro Impact Players article, merge it. Toast 
ltimatum
19:25, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
- Having seen what the Pro Impact Players page would look like with this videography on it, I support even moreso, the videography fit in very nicely without taking up a heap of space. Toast ltimatum
14:30, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
Go ahead and merge it once the time comes.--Starman125 (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
Merge Article isn't too long to merge with the main article. Mr. Anon
talk 22:16, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
I think this section could be good to merge. Dots The Kirby
17:15, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
Comments
Why are all you merge guys blatantly ignoring what Clarinet Hawk said? Omega Tyrant 22:20, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
- We're not, we're only expressing our opinions that this should be merged, for various reasons. --RoyboyX Talk 22:32, 21 October 2012 (EDT)
- Why are you assuming that because we don't agree with a bureaucrat, we didn't read what he typed? Toast ltimatum 13:50, 22 October 2012 (EDT)
- I think what OT was trying to say is that no one has justified why this information is notable enough to be on the main Pro Impact page, and not part of a sub-page linked therein. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 13:57, 22 October 2012 (EDT)
- Why are you assuming that because we don't agree with a bureaucrat, we didn't read what he typed? Toast
I'd like to bring this back up. This imo should be merged with the Pro Impact Players article, because the videography section on that page is quite sloppy, and this article's content can replace that as it is much better organized. We can add explanations of the videos to the table if anyone desires to keep them. --RoyboyX Talk 17:13, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
I do have one suggestion: We move the page to Pro Impact Players/Videography right now, so we can ditch the move tag, and improve what we currently have, then keep the discussion on merging going. Does anybody oppose this? Toast ltimatum 17:19, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
Go ahead. --RoyboyX Talk 17:19, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
That's... actually a brilliant compromise. I support. Air Conditioner I am the air con. 17:37, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
We moved the article so we could continue discussing merge, so the move discussion is now off the table. No one has said anything about not merging other than Clarinet Hawk. --RoyboyX Talk 14:23, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
- C. Hawk's argument for moving to a subpage is a whole lot stronger than what you merge guys are putting up (which just essentially consists of "I think this should be merged"), as well as blindly accusing me of appealing to authority when I pointed out you guys haven't addressed him. Refute C. Hawk, or there will be no merge.
Your argument also ignores how the videography section on the main page is for the most notable videos here. Omega Tyrant 09:19, 28 October 2012 (EDT)
