Talk:Dark Pit

Deletion discussion

Delete. Information regarding Pit's palette swap can easily be covered on the relevant page (or not at all; it reeks of original research and speculation), and information regarding his appearance in Palutena's reveal trailer is frankly not important enough to warrant an entire article; at best, a small blurb of some sort can be featured on background characters or a small sentence on either Pit's and/or Palutena's respective pages.

If Dark Pit is revealed as a character (as if!), he can have a page. But a palette swap that predates the character and a minor appearance in an unrelated reveal trailer aren't grounds for an entire article.

--- Monsieur Crow, Author Extraordinaire, 20:54, 15 June 2014 (EDT)

Support I agree; there's just not enough to warrant a page of his own yet. Berrenta (talk) 21:06, 15 June 2014 (EDT)

Support Per the above. blue ninjakoopa 21:56, 15 June 2014 (EDT)

Support Like the aforementioned supporters, Dark Pit is too little of a thing in Smash to make a stub on. Link PWNS (talk) 19:05, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

Support Per the users above.Tepig (talk) 19:18, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

Support As has been said, this article is just filled with speculative fluff and nothing warrants him having a page. --EndGenuity (talk) 19:37, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

just wait for the next reveal video they are talking about other characters like Mewtwo and maybe other Ninco (maybe spelled wrong) guys like the addition on Pac-Man --Reshiram1105 (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2014 (EDT)

Where did you hear that? I don't remember hearing anything like that anywhere. Berrenta (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2014 (EDT)

I'm not outright going to oppose yet, but I question whether or not this is non-notable enough to delete when we have a page on Phosphora due to a single trophy. VinLAURiA (talk) 16:39, 24 June 2014 (EDT)