Talk:Attack: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Definition of 'attack': new section) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''Merge''', along with the other I mode articles. ''[[User:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:navy;">Havoc</span>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:darkblue;">Reaper</span>]]'' 17:33, 12 January 2011 (EST) | '''Merge''', along with the other I mode articles. ''[[User:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:navy;">Havoc</span>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:darkblue;">Reaper</span>]]'' 17:33, 12 January 2011 (EST) | ||
== Definition of 'attack' == | |||
What's a good definiton of attack? A move that in some way aids a KO of a target character? I wouldn't say that damage or knockback has to be involved; I consider [[Sleep]] to be an attack. (Is this better for the forum?) <sup>Smiddle </sup>[[User:Smiddle|君怒る]][[user talk:Smiddle|?]] 11:48, 9 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:48, August 9, 2011
Shouldn't this article be part of the Training Mode article? I don't believe that the AI options in Training Mode warrant their own article. Omega Tyrant 
14:39, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
I agree. If there are any others, they should be merged also. --*Kinz* (talk) 14:41, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
Seems reasonable. Merge. --HavocReaper'48 15:22, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
Merge I agree with everyone above. Dr. Pain 99 
Talk 14:24, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
merge for reason above. --Vincent Tran Blorbs?
01:38, 12 January 2011 (EST)
Merge, per OT. – SmiddleT 14:42, 12 January 2011 (EST)
Keep, lol, jk, merge Per everyone else. ☆The Solar Dragon☆ 14:56, 12 January 2011 (EST)
Merge, along with the other I mode articles. HavocReaper 17:33, 12 January 2011 (EST)
Definition of 'attack'
What's a good definiton of attack? A move that in some way aids a KO of a target character? I wouldn't say that damage or knockback has to be involved; I consider Sleep to be an attack. (Is this better for the forum?) Smiddle 君怒る? 11:48, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
