SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Mr. Anon: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
#'''I don't think so, Tim.''' - You're an amazing editor, but your grammar and way of handling conflict is bad. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 02:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
#'''I don't think so, Tim.''' - You're an amazing editor, but your grammar and way of handling conflict is bad. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 02:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Read above. '''[[User:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:black;">Kperfekt</span>]]''' [[User talk:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:red;"><sup>Talk Is Cheap...</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kperfekt722|<span style="color:purple;"><sup>But I Am Not.</sup></span>]] 04:00, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Read above. '''[[User:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:black;">Kperfekt</span>]]''' [[User talk:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:red;"><sup>Talk Is Cheap...</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kperfekt722|<span style="color:purple;"><sup>But I Am Not.</sup></span>]] 04:00, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Strong Oppose'''.  We have no need for a janitorial sysop and you show an obvious lack of full understanding of the games to make you a "skill" sysop.  I've hardly ever seen you resolve user conflict in any way that is appropriate for an administrator, and I quite frankly don't trust your judgment.  I hate being this harsh, because you are a valuable contributor, but not all good college football players are NFL material and not all good soldiers are good generals...  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 04:21, June 24, 2010 (UTC)


==== Neutral ====
==== Neutral ====

Revision as of 00:21, June 24, 2010

Mr. Anon (talkcontribsedit countRFA page)

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
Hello. I've been contributing to this wiki for over 6 months. I've fought many vandals, and tagged many spam pages for deletion. I want Adminship to give me the tools to make this easier. I have had two IPs, so if you would like more information you could look through their contributions. One of my biggest goals here at this wiki is to fight vandalism. I keep hearing about schools not allowing Wikipedia as a source, saying that "anyone can edit it". I have always found wikipedia to be great resource however, but the vandalism there prevents it from becoming very reliable. Here, I would like to help Smashwiki keep its reliablity and respect throughout the Smash community. One of the worst kinds of vandalism is the creation of spam pages. When this happens, a normal user can't simply delete the page. They have to tag it with deletion, and an Administrator has to come and find it. However, there are times when the Admins aren't around when this kind of spam happens. I come here quite a lot, so I believe I can help stop this kind of spam. In short, I believe that I can use these tools responsibly, and hope you agree with me. Mr. Anon (talk) 18:54, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Slight Support I don't think you'd make a bad admin, but I think OT's RfA needs to be resolved first, and then after that we need to see if we need another sysop. Dr. Pain 99 Dp99.png Talk 21:29, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. No. You're a good editor, but frankly I don't see you, as you currently are, as sysop material. Sorry. Miles (talk) 23:06, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
  2. I don't think so, Tim. - You're an amazing editor, but your grammar and way of handling conflict is bad. BNK [E|T|C] 02:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Oppose Read above. Kperfekt Talk Is Cheap... But I Am Not. 04:00, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Strong Oppose. We have no need for a janitorial sysop and you show an obvious lack of full understanding of the games to make you a "skill" sysop. I've hardly ever seen you resolve user conflict in any way that is appropriate for an administrator, and I quite frankly don't trust your judgment. I hate being this harsh, because you are a valuable contributor, but not all good college football players are NFL material and not all good soldiers are good generals... Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 04:21, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. -10% I don't really know why, but there's something here that doesn't seem right. Yeah, you notice/fix vandals, but you don't really stand out as "will improve this wiki with adminship". You probably should have waited until a few weeks after OmegaTyrant's RfA gets resolved, because compared to him you're not the better candidate. Toomai Glittershine Toomai.png The Stats Guy 19:08, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
  2. I've been on this wiki for a bit longer than you have, and frankly I've done similar things for those months, yet I'm no admin myself. Not to say you'd be a bad admin or anything, but Toomai has a point there. --HavocReaper'48 19:22, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Leaning to oppose Not saying you'd be a bad admin, but I do that stuff as well, and I'm no admin. OT is trying to be admin right now. If he becomes admin, he'll patrol the wikia for a while.--MegaTron1XDDecepticon.png 20:09, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Leaning to oppose Eh, I don't really think we need another admin (excluding OT) and you are not quite ready yet.-Ivy73002MS.png 21:17, June 23, 2010 (UTC)