Help talk:Edit summary: Difference between revisions
Starman125 (talk | contribs) m (→Proposal) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''Support''' Agreed. --[[User:Starman125|Starman125]] ([[User talk:Starman125|talk]]) 23:36, 2 August 2014 (EDT) | '''Support''' Agreed. --[[User:Starman125|Starman125]] ([[User talk:Starman125|talk]]) 23:36, 2 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
I think this is safe to pass, anything we find wrong we can fix. [[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 22:28, 3 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:28, August 3, 2014
Proposal
It needs work, but I think we could use a help page on edit summaries. Toomai Glittershine 
The Riotous 14:42, 29 July 2014 (EDT)
Support Just as long as we don't start harassing users to use summaries for every edit, which imo can get annoying. RoyboyX Talk 15:13, 29 July 2014 (EDT)
Only critique is to agree with Royboy; a minor note should be added saying that not every edit needs an edit summary. Miles (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2014 (EDT)
Support Edit summaries should be a common aspect when editing wikis. Dots (talk) 
The Achiever 23:29, 30 July 2014 (EDT)
Okay I've gone and done some rewriting to try and get across that summaries are not mandatory for every single edit. Toomai Glittershine The Quintonic 12:21, 2 August 2014 (EDT)
Support Yeah. Scr7
(talk · contribs) 19:06, 2 August 2014 (EDT)
Support Per the other users; they're also very useful guidelines on how summaries should be generally structured. --Timson622222 (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2014 (EDT)
Support Agreed. --Starman125 (talk) 23:36, 2 August 2014 (EDT)
I think this is safe to pass, anything we find wrong we can fix. RoyboyX Talk 22:28, 3 August 2014 (EDT)
