Forum:Console Articles: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Per Omega Tyrant. --[[Special:Contributions/107.5.57.137|107.5.57.137]] 09:40, 6 August 2011 (EDT) | Per Omega Tyrant. --[[Special:Contributions/107.5.57.137|107.5.57.137]] 09:40, 6 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Looks like there's an agreement. Much thanks to all who agree with me. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 17:57, 7 August 2011 (EDT) | :Looks like there's an agreement. Much thanks to all who agree with me. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 17:57, 7 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
::We currently have 4 people for, 0 against. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 18:06, 7 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:06, August 7, 2011
Are they really necessary? Looks like a bunch of unneeded information on top of a chart that could otherwise be explained on character articles. Only three consoles hosted Super Smash Bros. games (N64 - SSB, GCN - SSBM, Wii - SSBB), and even they hold little relevant information other than the charts on their pages. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 23:22, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- I agree. Having articles about key games is one thing, but the console articles are just lists of characters that appeared. Honestly I think the Wii is the only necessary one, as all three games are available on it. Mr. Anon (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
- Bump. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 15:14, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- Guys. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 21:13, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
There's really no need to be impatient enough to bump something after 6 hours.
As for my opinion, while I agree the possible information is limited, I find it hard to imagine a game-based wiki that lacks articles on the platforms its games are on. Despite the articles' rather limited usefulness, they're most likely expected by the public. Toomai Glittershine 
The Honcho 21:51, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- I'd like to think that waiting six hours is anything but impatient. :/ Your reasoning only justifies the GCN, N64, and Wii articles, but the others are still useless (information on them can be found on character and universe articles respectively). Sooooooo yeah. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 00:02, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
Like Toomai said, I agree in keeping the articles of consoles that had a Smash Bros. game. But for the other consoles, I do agree with BNK that they are rather useless for a Smash Bros. Wiki. Omega Tyrant 
01:54, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
Per Omega Tyrant. --107.5.57.137 09:40, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
- Looks like there's an agreement. Much thanks to all who agree with me. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 17:57, 7 August 2011 (EDT)
