SmashWiki talk:Notability

Line 71:

:'''Support''' - As I've said elsewhere, this will make these sections easier to maintain. [[User:Wiifitkid|Wiifitkid]] ([[User talk:Wiifitkid|talk]]) 12:32, January 28, 2024 (EST)

:'''Support with revisions''' - I think the proposed time tables are too long, I think the sections should be created after six months (perhaps with only a three or four player limit?) and the player limit gradually expanded afterwards rather than being limited to two players for a full two years. [[User:Stuart98|Stuart98]] ([[User talk:Stuart98|talk]]) 14:38, February 11, 2024 (EST)

::I think you misread; after a year when the sections are opened up, it would be a limit of five players until the two year mark, not two players. As for doing "six months but a limit of three or four players", I would rather not still; seeing how few players from the very early meta actually stick around on these sections, and with how low sample and highly volatile early meta results are, it would be easier for everyone to wait a year for the meta to settle somewhat before creating these section and debating which players have already established historical significance. [[User:Omega Tyrant|Omega]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|Tyrant]] [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 18:57, February 11, 2024 (EST)

:'''Support''' per above, recency bias is very counter-intuitive when evaluating "historically significant" players. --[[File:PlagueSigImage.png|20px]][[User:Plague von Karma|'''Plague''']][[User talk:Plague von Karma|''' von Karma''']][[File:PlagueSigImage.png|20px]] 15:17, February 11, 2024 (EST)

SmashWiki talk:Notability: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Participate

Tools

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 :'''Support''' - As I've said elsewhere, this will make these sections easier to maintain. [[User:Wiifitkid|Wiifitkid]] ([[User talk:Wiifitkid|talk]]) 12:32, January 28, 2024 (EST)
 :'''Support with revisions''' - I think the proposed time tables are too long, I think the sections should be created after six months (perhaps with only a three or four player limit?) and the player limit gradually expanded afterwards rather than being limited to two players for a full two years. [[User:Stuart98|Stuart98]] ([[User talk:Stuart98|talk]]) 14:38, February 11, 2024 (EST)
+::I think you misread; after a year when the sections are opened up, it would be a limit of five players until the two year mark, not two players. As for doing "six months but a limit of three or four players", I would rather not still; seeing how few players from the very early meta actually stick around on these sections, and with how low sample and highly volatile early meta results are, it would be easier for everyone to wait a year for the meta to settle somewhat before creating these section and debating which players have already established historical significance. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 18:57, February 11, 2024 (EST)
 :'''Support''' per above, recency bias is very counter-intuitive when evaluating "historically significant" players. --[[File:PlagueSigImage.png|20px]][[User:Plague von Karma|<span style="color: #4952eb;">'''Plague'''</span>]][[User talk:Plague von Karma|<span style="color: #4952eb;">''' von Karma'''</span>]][[File:PlagueSigImage.png|20px]] 15:17, February 11, 2024 (EST)