Talk:Buff

"characters"

I won't revert just yet, but I think in order for an entire CHARACTER to be buffed or nerfed, that would require a high degree of unbalance. Not only that, but some characters, like Peach, have had SOME moves buffed and OTHERS nerfed. Can someone help me with this??? - Gargomon251 20:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Pure speculation and some topics from Gfaqs and smashboards. Thats why I put considered in the title. Revert if you like, thats why we're here =] ItemHazard 20:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC) ItemHazard

I just didn't want to start an edit war. I will leave the SSB64→Melee data because I do feel the original was a bit unbalanced. - Gargomon251 20:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

smash 64 not balanced.....you kidding me right? Its way more balanced than melee or brawl besides Samus and Pikachu. On a related note, Fox is considered second best by most people now in smash 64. I'm changing him to minor User:KoRoBeNiKi

Attacks?

Why is buffing confined only to "attacks" buffed? There are other factors that can be buffed about a character such as weight, speed, recovery, size, traction, etc. Plus the article currently states in the intro "...From Melee to Brawl, Zelda is slightly quicker, Din's Fire was improved,..." The slightly quicker part has nothing to do with attacks. I think the buffed article (as well as the nerfed article while we're on the subject) should be changed to just "buffed", not "the strengthing of a veteran character's attacks" or "Characters who had attacks buffed..." Anyone else agree? Enigmatic Mr. L (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Split

Oppose This page shows buffs for every game, which in my opinion, is better than having a page that only shows buffs for one game. Bandit 11:11, 1 September 2012 (EDT)

Support When SSB4 comes out, this page will increase in size massively, and become quite unwieldy to read. Plus it would be better organised than one massive page listing every buff in every game. Omega Tyrant 15:24, 1 September 2012 (EDT)