Talk:Azurda: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
:I also support it. Why does this page exist? I only undid Miles’ edit on Munchie because we can’t get rid of that until we get eid of this. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 14:15, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
:I also support it. Why does this page exist? I only undid Miles’ edit on Munchie because we can’t get rid of that until we get eid of this. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 14:15, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
::'''Oppose''', because Azurda is a separate character that is part of Rex's Mii costume, in which that characters that are a part of a Mii costume get pages. Azurda also has an animation of bouncing in the hood of the costume. Why shouldn't he get a page? It was originally thought that Navi couldn't have one before, but it was decided that her page is fine despite her appearance being very minor (a taunt). Or Cappy who only got one on the grounds that he was a hat (the taunts getting pages wasn't discussed before that). Is being ''apart'' of a Mii costume ''really'' not enough in Azurda's case? [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 14:31, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
::'''Oppose''', because Azurda is a separate character that is part of Rex's Mii costume, in which that characters that are a part of a Mii costume get pages. Azurda also has an animation of bouncing in the hood of the costume. Why shouldn't he get a page? It was originally thought that Navi couldn't have one before, but it was decided that her page is fine despite her appearance being very minor (a taunt). Or Cappy who only got one on the grounds that he was a hat (the taunts getting pages wasn't discussed before that). Is being ''apart'' of a Mii costume ''really'' not enough in Azurda's case? [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 14:31, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
:::Cappy is a Mii costume piece in his own right. Navi is a borderline case that I'm not sure warrants a page. This, being a minor sub-part of a costume themed after another character, is outright unnecessary. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 14:35, June 28, 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:35, June 28, 2019

Deletion

I support deletion, because I didn't even know who this character was before today, or even that he was part of the Rex Mii costume. And like Miles said, he doesn't have any sort of animation focused on him. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Gamer Leave a message if needed 14:12, June 28, 2019 (EDT)

I also support it. Why does this page exist? I only undid Miles’ edit on Munchie because we can’t get rid of that until we get eid of this. Lou Cena (talk) 14:15, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
Oppose, because Azurda is a separate character that is part of Rex's Mii costume, in which that characters that are a part of a Mii costume get pages. Azurda also has an animation of bouncing in the hood of the costume. Why shouldn't he get a page? It was originally thought that Navi couldn't have one before, but it was decided that her page is fine despite her appearance being very minor (a taunt). Or Cappy who only got one on the grounds that he was a hat (the taunts getting pages wasn't discussed before that). Is being apart of a Mii costume really not enough in Azurda's case? Wolff (talk) 14:31, June 28, 2019 (EDT)
Cappy is a Mii costume piece in his own right. Navi is a borderline case that I'm not sure warrants a page. This, being a minor sub-part of a costume themed after another character, is outright unnecessary. Miles (talk) 14:35, June 28, 2019 (EDT)