Talk:Aqua jump (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Maybe it could be a new technique: nothing after the datestamp)
Line 19: Line 19:
This could give Mario and Squirtle an advantage in competitive play. Why not make it a strategy?
This could give Mario and Squirtle an advantage in competitive play. Why not make it a strategy?
Remember,
Remember,
Vote NO For Issue #2 [[Special:Contributions/174.101.76.107|174.101.76.107]] 15:55, 7 November 2011 (EST)?????
Vote NO For Issue #2 [[Special:Contributions/174.101.76.107|174.101.76.107]] 15:55, 7 November 2011 (EST)
:Explanation? You just can't say something is useful without demonstrating why it is. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 16:03, 7 November 2011 (EST)
:Explanation? You just can't say something is useful without demonstrating why it is. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 16:03, 7 November 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 17:47, November 7, 2011

Could someone please add a video link or video to this page?--MysteryHeff ~ Ike Rox Sox off TALK ~ CONTRIBS 05:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, couldn't find anything on Youtube :'( Cheezperson {talk}stuff 05:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

would anyone be able to maybe make a video for it then, only if there willing to?--MysteryHeff ~ Ike Rox Sox off TALK ~ CONTRIBS 11:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

The merge

I say No. For one thing, it's about 2 attacks.--MegaTron1XD:p 03:14, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

The article's really, really short, though, and I can't think of anything better to do with it. Anon 04:01, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
A short article isn't a good reason for a merge. This can occur in the next SSB.--MegaTron1XD:p 04:04, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
No, but it could easily be explained in both the articles about water gun and FLUDD. Mr. Anon teh awsome 04:09, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Well, It deals with two different articles, so it really can't be merged into both. 25T16 MarioHeadSSBB.png It's-a me! 23:43, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
Since it's only two sentences, it can be mentioned on both pages. Mr. Anon (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
Also, it is generally not a good idea to bump a topic that is over a year old. Mr. Anon (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
While the topic is over a year old, the merge tag is still on, and the previous conversation came to no consensus/conclusion. So the bump here was perfectly fine. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 00:53, 16 August 2011 (EDT)

For myself, I think the information here belong in those articles. This isn't really a "technique", or anything notable enough for its own article. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png

Why not putting this ' technique' to both article? (-O-)Lucas-IV- pikaaaaLucas alive.PNG 14:36, 10 September 2011 (EDT)

Maybe it could be a new technique

This could give Mario and Squirtle an advantage in competitive play. Why not make it a strategy? Remember, Vote NO For Issue #2 174.101.76.107 15:55, 7 November 2011 (EST)

Explanation? You just can't say something is useful without demonstrating why it is. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 16:03, 7 November 2011 (EST)