Forum:Get rid of "update history" section in character pages?: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Neutral/Mixed/Undecided: Doesn't look like anyone is using #.)
Line 14: Line 14:


===Neutral/Mixed/Undecided===
===Neutral/Mixed/Undecided===
#Hope you don't mind me adding this new section, but I can't make up my mind. I'm just not sure what to do. On one hand, people might want to compare the old to the new. On the other hand, it is less cluttering. However, it would be annoying to check each, individual update. Would they at least be put on a new, separate page? [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 20:49, 2 February 2016 (EST)
Hope you don't mind me adding this new section, but I can't make up my mind. I'm just not sure what to do. On one hand, people might want to compare the old to the new. On the other hand, it is less cluttering. However, it would be annoying to check each, individual update. Would they at least be put on a new, separate page? [[User:Unowninator|Unowninator]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 20:49, 2 February 2016 (EST)
#'''Undecided'''. If we removed it we would still have to update every page where the character changed. We wouldn't have the same data however on two different pages, however. It seems less convenient to have it like this and would have to look at multiple different pages just to see what we could be seen in one section. We could have all updates in one page which would alleviate that problem. -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 20:54, 2 February 2016 (EST)
 
'''Undecided'''. If we removed it we would still have to update every page where the character changed. We wouldn't have the same data however on two different pages, however. It seems less convenient to have it like this and would have to look at multiple different pages just to see what we could be seen in one section. We could have all updates in one page which would alleviate that problem. -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 20:54, 2 February 2016 (EST)


This is going to be a huge mess no matter how you do it. The problem is that you have to decide which of the following we care about listing on the main "Character (SSB4)" page:
This is going to be a huge mess no matter how you do it. The problem is that you have to decide which of the following we care about listing on the main "Character (SSB4)" page:

Revision as of 22:41, February 2, 2016

Forums: Index Watercooler Get rid of "update history" section in character pages?

So I am suggesting that we remove the "update history" section in character pages, as this essentially is the same information as what can be found on these pages. Having this on the character pages really is just extra clutter: Having a "changes from Brawl" section which details changes from Brawl to the latest version of SSB4 should really be plenty. But I wanted to hear all your thoughts on the matter as usual, so please, discuss. Serpent SKSig.png King 20:42, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Support removal

  1. Support. 1) There's a table of contents. So no clutter. 2) It makes the page easier to read. 3) We can keep the CFB section up to date without worrying about an extra section. Ganonmew, The Evil Clone 20:51, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Oppose removal

  1. Strong oppose. I like being able to see a character's changes on their page without having to scroll through a list of characters I don't necessarily care about. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:44, 2 February 2016 (EST)
    ...That's what the table of contents is for. Serpent SKSig.png King 20:47, 2 February 2016 (EST)
    Eh, still. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 20:49, 2 February 2016 (EST)
  2. Extra clutter? Oppose. Also there's no log for 1.0.4 Kirby's Crazy Appetite ~ KirbyHeadYellowSSB.png 20:49, 2 February 2016 (EST)
  3. Oppose... because I was the one who started the project. --My signature's image :v The 70's called. They said BeepYou was here :v (talk) 21:21, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Neutral/Mixed/Undecided

Hope you don't mind me adding this new section, but I can't make up my mind. I'm just not sure what to do. On one hand, people might want to compare the old to the new. On the other hand, it is less cluttering. However, it would be annoying to check each, individual update. Would they at least be put on a new, separate page? Unowninator (talk) 20:49, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Undecided. If we removed it we would still have to update every page where the character changed. We wouldn't have the same data however on two different pages, however. It seems less convenient to have it like this and would have to look at multiple different pages just to see what we could be seen in one section. We could have all updates in one page which would alleviate that problem. -- EthanThis is a user image for Ethan7. Duplicate of:  File:DiddyKongHeadBlueSSB4-U.png(Discussion) 20:54, 2 February 2016 (EST)

This is going to be a huge mess no matter how you do it. The problem is that you have to decide which of the following we care about listing on the main "Character (SSB4)" page:

  • Total changes from Brawl to SSB4 with no patches
  • Total changes from Brawl to SSB4's current patch
  • Total changes from SSB4 with no patches to SSB4's current patch
  • Patch-by-patch update history

Logistically there's no easy way to present all of these in a concise manner. The issue is that none of them are "wrong", as much as they're providing some of the same data in different ways. Miles (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2016 (EST)

Given that the information exists elsewhere, why is it needed on each individual character page? Serpent SKSig.png King 21:23, 2 February 2016 (EST)