Forum:Competitive history: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
#Good enough for me  [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the God-Slayer 06:47, 18 October 2016 (EDT)
#Good enough for me  [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the God-Slayer 06:47, 18 October 2016 (EDT)
#My only concern is the potential lack of content for Brawl and 64, but if they can be done properly, I'm all for it. Smash 4 should have one either way. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:Black">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 18:33, 19 October 2016 (EDT)
#My only concern is the potential lack of content for Brawl and 64, but if they can be done properly, I'm all for it. Smash 4 should have one either way. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:Black">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 18:33, 19 October 2016 (EDT)
#''Support, leaning towards neutrality''. As for what Trip is saying below, I do believe we can make articles for the history of competitive Smash 64 and Brawl; 64 has a short but easy to understand history and few things that allow it to not be barebones, while Brawl has quite the history too. An "infamous" one to be exact... heheh... heh... But for real, I also echo Trip in the fact doing them could take some work and nobody wants to write them, because while the story for 64 is easy to understand, it is a bit hard to find the entire history because of the lack of people playing the game. As for Brawl, it is quite lengthy, at seven years, and most points would talk about how Meta Knight was, is and has always been good. On a last note, let's give ''SSB4'' some more time for it to develop, just another tier list, alrite? There's not ENOUGH history for the game yet. --[[File:BeepYouSignature.png|40px]] '''Merry Christ... I mean,''' <font color="Orange">'''Happy Halloween from'''</font> [[User:BeepYou|<font color="Orange">'''BeepYou...'''</font>]] [[User talk:BeepYou|<font color="#A91101">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 18:24, 28 October 2016 (EDT)


===Oppose===
===Oppose===

Revision as of 18:24, October 28, 2016

Forums: Index → Proposals → Competitive history
Proposed.png This discussion is in regards to a proposed change on SmashWiki. The discussion must first meet with a consensus before it is implemented.

We have a "History of competitive Melee" article; why don't we have such articles for the other Smash games? RickTommy 01:29, 18 October 2016 (EDT)

Support

  1. RickTommy 01:29, 18 October 2016 (EDT)
  2. As long as someone is willing to do it, I don't see why not. Serpent SKSigHalloween.png King 01:40, 18 October 2016 (EDT)
  3. Good enough for me PoultrysigSSB4.pngPoultryPoultrysigSSBM.png(talk) the God-Slayer 06:47, 18 October 2016 (EDT)
  4. My only concern is the potential lack of content for Brawl and 64, but if they can be done properly, I'm all for it. Smash 4 should have one either way. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 18:33, 19 October 2016 (EDT)
  5. Support, leaning towards neutrality. As for what Trip is saying below, I do believe we can make articles for the history of competitive Smash 64 and Brawl; 64 has a short but easy to understand history and few things that allow it to not be barebones, while Brawl has quite the history too. An "infamous" one to be exact... heheh... heh... But for real, I also echo Trip in the fact doing them could take some work and nobody wants to write them, because while the story for 64 is easy to understand, it is a bit hard to find the entire history because of the lack of people playing the game. As for Brawl, it is quite lengthy, at seven years, and most points would talk about how Meta Knight was, is and has always been good. On a last note, let's give SSB4 some more time for it to develop, just another tier list, alrite? There's not ENOUGH history for the game yet. --My signature's image :v Merry Christ... I mean, Happy Halloween from BeepYou... (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2016 (EDT)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. I'm kinda torn to be honest. I'm fairly certain that the main reason Melee has one is due to how lengthy it is and how much has happened over the past decade or so. I mean, a lot happened throughout Melee's lifespan. SSB4 certainly does have quite a bit, but here's where the issue sets in: SSB64 and Brawl. Yeah, SSB64 does have some noteworthy stuff to mention, but AFAIK it's not a lot compared to Melee and SSB4, and with the fact that people immediately ditched Brawl after they realized that it sucks competitively, there's not a whole lot for Brawl to cover either. With that being said, I'm neither supporting nor opposing this, but I'm at least getting my opinions out there for those who intend to vote in the near future. Disaster Flare DisasterFlareHalloweenSigImage.png (talk) 19:28, 18 October 2016 (EDT)
    Yeah this is pretty much "we don't currently have them because no one's made the effort yet", as opposed to "we don't currently have them because we're against them" as the original suggestion kinda-sorta implies. Toomai Glittershine ??? The Orchestral 07:15, 19 October 2016 (EDT)

Comments

Retrieved from "https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Forum:Competitive_history&oldid=908455"