Forum:Amendment to Trivia guidelines (complexity)

This discussion is in regards to a proposed change on SmashWiki. The discussion must first meet with a consensus before it is implemented.

During most of my time on this wiki, there's been a lot of people, IPs in particular, that try to inflate trivia sections with overly specific items, such as this, or this, or this, or this, or this. Many of these get reverted anyway, or in the case of the latter one, rewritten and simplified, but my main argument is that not restricting the level of complexity allowed on trivia, which by the way should be something that can just be skimmed through anyway, people will be able to add all sorts of qualifiers to make trivia out of literally anything. I feel like we should probably amend SW:TRIVIA to include a item on complex trivia for "What makes bad trivia". It should probably go something like this:

• Complexity. "Roy is the only playable character who debuted in the Super Smash Bros. series worldwide, debuting in Melee. Outside Japan, though, he shares this distinction with Marth and Corrin, which had their first games released overseas in 2010 and 2016 respectively, plus Lucas, that never had his game released outside Japan." Adding qualifiers to trivia points or adding sub-notes in brackets will only serve to dilute what constitutes notable trivia. Trivia needs to be detailed, but it also needs to be simple and easy to understand.

Let me know what you think, as well as how to improve on this. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the internets go! :3 04:32, 6 August 2018 (EDT)

Support

1. Alright I believe this is a great idea that'll greatly benefit SmashWiki, after all my first edit was on a trivia section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainDabsalot (talk • contribs) 08:16, 6 August 2018 (EDT)
2. If you have to be extremely specific to get your point across, then there's not really a point in putting it down. Some pieces of trivia do have to be long and complex, but in those cases, it's only because they cover a lot of content, not because they have specifics that make them valid. Aidan, the College-Bound Rurouni 19:45, 6 August 2018 (EDT)
3. This will definitely improve the quality of trivia. Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Sonic Fan Leave a message if needed 19:48, 6 August 2018 (EDT)
4. "Simple and easy to understand" is what trivia is supposed to be for. It's not supposed to force the reader to hunt down the part that actually matters. Serpent  King 19:50, 6 August 2018 (EDT)

Comments

On this note actually, I'm curious. How many of you think that SW:TRIVIA should be a full policy instead of a guideline? Serpent  King 19:50, 6 August 2018 (EDT)