Talk:Multi-Man mode

Deleted

I say we get rid of all the tiny little articles about all the small Multi-Man Melee, and merge all the relevant information into the Multi-Man Melee article. Then we can delete all the Multi-Man Melee stubs. I have done the first part of this plan to the first 4 articles. Could someone else assist?--Oxico 12:49, December 13, 2007 (EST)

I insist we do this. If anyone has reason for opposition, post it here.--Oxico (talk) 23:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

I am of an EXTREME OPPOSITION. This article MUST NOT be deleted. It is off extreme importance. Kperfekt722 (talk) 23:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

We are not removing this article, but every other Multi-Man articles and putting them in here. I agree that we should but delete them and put them in here. SuperLuigi 03:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Move

I don't like this move idea. The current title is fine, and moving it doesn't seem to confer any particular advantage. Toomai Glittershine The Different 13:28, 1 November 2014 (EDT)

I oppose the move. It's only called "Multi-man Smash" in one game, so it would be useless to move it there if there are two other similar modes with different names. Rtzxy Reflect!!! 13:31, 1 November 2014 (EDT)

I strongly oppose. See my reasoning on Talk:Special mode. PikaSamus (talk) 13:46, 19 December 2014 (EST)

Items

Do we really need to give an explanation on why certain items don't appear in the mode? I mean, they're logical, but are they necessary, and could be wrong? I'm saying no to the former, and yes to the latter. Smashedpotatoes (talk) 13:10, 14 August 2015 (EDT)

Merge modes here

Discussion on this merge should take place here. Serpent King 22:11, 5 May 2016 (EDT)

I would agree to merge these if you're saying that there shouldn't really be much to say about them separately. Dots (talk) The Quake 22:48, 5 May 2016 (EDT)

This one's a bit dubious because when combined it approaches the 32k marker of "maybe should be split", and I don't think there'd be a good way to organize the list(s) of rewards on such a merged page. It also kind of messes with the categorization of submodes that aren't in all games. So overall not a big fan of the idea at the moment. Toomai Glittershine The Emissary 23:00, 5 May 2016 (EDT)

^That's the reason why I didn't just do it. What I am thinking is that it's a little silly to have 3-Minute mode and 15-Minute mode or 10-Man mode and 100-Man mode on their own page. However, we can't merge just those separately, because then what do we call the target pages (if 10-Man got merged with 100-Man or the like with the timed matches)? Serpent King 23:08, 5 May 2016 (EDT)

Yeah doing half-merges like that is pretty much the least sensible thing to do in my opinion. It has to be all or nothing. Toomai Glittershine The Keymaster 00:15, 6 May 2016 (EDT)

Oppose But make a navigation template Poultry(talk) the God-Slayer 07:31, 6 May 2016 (EDT)

We could make a collapsible table for the rewards and handle the listing of which games submodes are in in a similar manner to Special mode. Still, Toomai makes a good point with the page size, and so I'm neutral. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 21:05, 6 May 2016 (EDT)

Oppose; it's messy separate but would be messier all on one page. Miles (talk) 15:29, 8 May 2016 (EDT)

Oppose. I personally see it fine as is. Should we merge this, we would need to give a brief description for each mode to avoid this article being too big and the rewards section is going to be messy. Dots (talk) The Five by Five 09:40, 10 May 2016 (EDT)