Talk:Event pattern: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎keep it: new section)
Line 10: Line 10:


'''Bump.''' [[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 14:45, 21 September 2013 (EDT)
'''Bump.''' [[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 14:45, 21 September 2013 (EDT)
== keep it ==
it might not be the most notable thing, but it isnt a stub, it is well written and descriptive. i say keep it.
[[User:DJLO|DJLO]] ([[User talk:DJLO|talk]]) 10:27, 25 September 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:27, September 25, 2013

Deletion Discussion

In some cases lack of notoriety might be a candidate for deletion, but I think there is still a good amount of information to elaborate on here - there is also the possibility for new a new stage builder which could allow us to reorganize or merge some of the information in the future. Additionally, event patterns describe the underlying mechanics of aspects of stages, which I think are important. --Quilt (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2013 (EDT)

As far as I can tell this page basically defines some terms for how stage elements behave. Why can't that just be put on the stage elements page? Toomai Glittershine ??? The Honcho 10:50, 6 September 2013 (EDT)
That's probably a better idea. At the time I felt like the amount of things that could be said about how elements behaved would overshadow the rest of page about stage elements, but now I see that makes little sense, Lol. --Quilt (talk) 06:04, 7 September 2013 (EDT)

Bump. Scr7Scr7 sig.png(talk · contribs) 12:51, 13 September 2013 (EDT)

Bump x2. I say merge w/ stage elements. RoyboyX Talk 20:49, 18 September 2013 (EDT)

Bump. RoyboyX Talk 14:45, 21 September 2013 (EDT)

keep it

it might not be the most notable thing, but it isnt a stub, it is well written and descriptive. i say keep it.

DJLO (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2013 (EDT)