Forum:Charizard's speed actually faster.: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
:::::''Pokemon Change's invincibility is useless because of the lag as soon as a Pokemon comes out WITHOUT invincibility frames.'' | :::::''Pokemon Change's invincibility is useless because of the lag as soon as a Pokemon comes out WITHOUT invincibility frames.'' | ||
:::::You seemed to have misread my statement. I said the only way to change Pokemon without getting punished or giving up an opportunity is during the | :::::You seemed to have misread my statement. I said the only way to change Pokemon without getting punished or giving up an opportunity is during the invincibility you get right when you revive from losing a stock. | ||
invincibility you get right when you revive from losing a stock. | |||
:::::''How's that?!'' | :::::''How's that?!'' | ||
:::::In honesty, you seem to be highly biased towards Charizard, and lack competitive experience (saying Snake is only good for one combo is a huge flag here). Have you ever been to a serious tournament before, or at least fought competent players in a competitive manner? <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 13:52, 28 November 2011 (EST) | :::::In honesty, you seem to be highly biased towards Charizard, and lack competitive experience (saying Snake is only good for one combo is a huge flag here). Have you ever been to a serious tournament before, or at least fought competent players in a competitive manner? <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 13:52, 28 November 2011 (EST) | ||
I never fought Snake when he was in control of an actual good Snake player. Believe it or not I rarely use the other Pokemon in battle EVER and I managed 21 KOs in Cruel Brawl. However I take back most of what I said about Snake, because I had used him not a long time ago and found all of his physical attacks AMAZING. And yes I've been to serious tourneys at a Books a Million and won 2nd place in a 32 player finals ( lost to Meta-Knight player # 19 but gave a fantastic effort). Players scratched their heads in confusion of how Charizard could ever match a Meta-Knight. Only one person used Snake and lost during quarter finals by a Luigi player.My friend Lenny played Toon Link but lost to that particular player ( Meta-Knight #19). I use other characters in battle a lot but Charizard is my main, not Pokemon Trainer. I can match other Players who use the broken Meta-Knight with extreme unpredictability and change tactics that both work and don't work throughout battle at random times. Saying I have lack of competitive experience is a real big insult on me so I had to explain otherwise.[[User:Drakon64|Drakon64]] ([[User talk:Drakon64|talk]]) 16:53, 28 November 2011 (EST) | ::::::I never fought Snake when he was in control of an actual good Snake player. Believe it or not I rarely use the other Pokemon in battle EVER and I managed 21 KOs in Cruel Brawl. However I take back most of what I said about Snake, because I had used him not a long time ago and found all of his physical attacks AMAZING. And yes I've been to serious tourneys at a Books a Million and won 2nd place in a 32 player finals ( lost to Meta-Knight player # 19 but gave a fantastic effort). Players scratched their heads in confusion of how Charizard could ever match a Meta-Knight. Only one person used Snake and lost during quarter finals by a Luigi player.My friend Lenny played Toon Link but lost to that particular player ( Meta-Knight #19). I use other characters in battle a lot but Charizard is my main, not Pokemon Trainer. I can match other Players who use the broken Meta-Knight with extreme unpredictability and change tactics that both work and don't work throughout battle at random times. Saying I have lack of competitive experience is a real big insult on me so I had to explain otherwise.[[User:Drakon64|Drakon64]] ([[User talk:Drakon64|talk]]) 16:53, 28 November 2011 (EST) | ||
:::::::In my experience, nearly every player who is over zealous about their low/bottom tier mains tend to have next to no competitive experience, especially if they claim a bonafide top/high tier character is a poor character. Nice to see though that you aren't completely inexperienced. Anyway, it's fine to think your character is underrated (which can work as a good source of motivation to succeed in competitive play), but avoid getting delusional about it. Failure to recognise your character's shortcomings will hinder your progress and your success with them. The best way to prove a character is underrated though, is by succeeding with them in tournament well beyond what their tier placement would indicate (like [[Smasher:San|San]] did with Ike). No amount of theorycraft and debate can compare to consistent high tournament placings. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 18:49, 28 November 2011 (EST) | |||
