Talk:Warlock Punch

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki

Warlock Punch Differences[edit]

Isn't Ganondorf's Brawl version of Warlock Punch stronger than the Melee version? - GalaxiaD (talk) 21:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

In melee, wasn't it called Gerudo Punch? Or is it just a mistake in the article?

It was Warlock Punch in SSBM. You may be thinking of Gerudo Dragon in SSBM, which was his Side-B. The only change I know of, is the Reverse Warlock Punch, and a slightly different animation. -BEN!

Warlock Punch + Soccer Ball[edit]

I have seen a video in which a (reverse) Warlock Punched Soccer Ball was able to cause an insane amount of damage; over 900%. However, this may have been using increases to damage ratio. Is the Warlock Punch is able to do this to a soccer ball without increasing damage ratio, and if so, is it worthy of mention in the article? 17:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


Can somebody prove that last bit of trivia? Cheezperson {talk}stuff 00:09, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

Perused the General Overview[edit]

Ye all are right about the extreme difficulty off performing an aerial Reverse Warlock Punch. I just think it's flat-out impossible to do in a standard match. The way I see it, you'd have to play a Bunny Light Brawl to make it more possible to accomplish this. A Sacred Combo is impossible with Warlock Punch, so you can forget it. Not that I like Ganondorf, or any other Legend of Zelda character for that matter, sug, but I'm pretty interested in what attacks and attributes thereof they have to offer. Bottom line: anything that is extremely difficult = impossible to perform! Lili Rochefort 1965 (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2010 (EST)

Reverse aerial Warlock Punch is possible to land without items, higher platforms, or physic changes with the Flight of Ganon (though precise timing is required). But its practicality is questionable. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 19:33, 30 December 2010 (EST)
Talk pages are not for expressing your opinion of the subject. They are to only be used for discussing ways to improve the article. Mr. Anon (talk) 23:27, 5 January 2011 (EST)
It is, eh? My apologies, hun. Thanks for reminding me; I'm new at this sort of thing. Lili Rochefort 1965 (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2011 (EST)