Weak oppose. Some of these websites were in fact distinct from SmashBoards, and if we can get info on them from the wayback machine, it would be easy to expand this article.Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 21:56, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
- None of these sites were distinct from SmashBoards. They were all part of a sort of "ring" of websites that SmashBoards was initially formed around. Ever wonder why it was originally called Smash World Forums?
Support. Sites offer nothing interesting to cover, SmashWiki is not fanon, and these sites were frankly never significant compared to SmashBoards.
- For the record, I support the merge, but I won't allow it to go off on the just the nom's vote. Serpent King 23:27, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
Support. Horribly outdated websites that were not even notable in the slightest. While some of this could be mentioned in Smashboards' history but otherwise, I would even go further to say delete. MHStarCraft 19:02, 9 July 2017 (EDT)