Template talk:GlobalPR: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (→Wait) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::::'''Support''', on the condition that the alternate PRs get their own separate template. [[User:Smore|Smore]] ([[User talk:Smore|talk]]) 23:39, August 1, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::'''Support''', on the condition that the alternate PRs get their own separate template. [[User:Smore|Smore]] ([[User talk:Smore|talk]]) 23:39, August 1, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:'''Oppose'''. I don't see why they should be split up or have to use two templates, this is fine. --[[User:Meester Tweester|Meester Tweester]] ([[User talk:Meester Tweester|talk]]) 15:10, August 2, 2019 (EDT) | :'''Oppose'''. I don't see why they should be split up or have to use two templates, this is fine. --[[User:Meester Tweester|Meester Tweester]] ([[User talk:Meester Tweester|talk]]) 15:10, August 2, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::This doesn't separate official PRs from unofficial ones. This may cause people to confuse which one to use, and even use unofficial rankings instead of the official ones. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 15:15, August 2, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:15, August 2, 2019
Wait
Why are we including unofficial PRs? Unofficial as in OrionRank and EventHubs. Cookies
Creme 17:59, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- I added every global PR that I could find that had a page on the wiki. What makes those two less official than the others? If they are unofficial, we should delete those pages I think. Smore (talk) 18:02, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- By official, I mean the ones accepted for tournament rankings and the like. I believe unofficial PRs are fine since they do provide a different way of ranking, however I don't believe it should be included here since it seems like it's for the official PRs. Cookies
Creme 18:08, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- I still don't know why some are considered official and some not, but if that's the case, should we make a separate template for the unofficial ones? I'd still like a navigational template for those pages you see. Perhaps {{FanGlobalPR}} Smore (talk) 18:25, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- A better term would be "alternate PRs", but the point is that they're still notable within the community, but aren't as widely accepted or advertised as the others are, hence why those ones are considered the "official" PRs. PokemonMasterJamal3 (talk) 18:29, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- Personally I don't think we should be including any alternate PRs. It's only adding more fluff to an already bloated template. As other people have mentioned, they are typically disregarded in favor of the more widely accepted ones. If we're going to vote on this, then I Support removing the alternate PRs. Pokebub (talk) 22:56, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- A better term would be "alternate PRs", but the point is that they're still notable within the community, but aren't as widely accepted or advertised as the others are, hence why those ones are considered the "official" PRs. PokemonMasterJamal3 (talk) 18:29, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- I still don't know why some are considered official and some not, but if that's the case, should we make a separate template for the unofficial ones? I'd still like a navigational template for those pages you see. Perhaps {{FanGlobalPR}} Smore (talk) 18:25, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
- By official, I mean the ones accepted for tournament rankings and the like. I believe unofficial PRs are fine since they do provide a different way of ranking, however I don't believe it should be included here since it seems like it's for the official PRs. Cookies
- Oppose. I don't see why they should be split up or have to use two templates, this is fine. --Meester Tweester (talk) 15:10, August 2, 2019 (EDT)
