Talk:Sonic (PM): Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Drilly Dilly (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This is not about "my edit VS. that edit", it's about making pages more encyclopedic. <b>[[User:john3637881|<span style="color: black;">John</span>]]</b> [[File:John3637881 Signature.png|20px]] <b>[[User talk:John3637881|<span style="color: red;">PK SMAAAASH!!</span>]]</b> 18:53, 3 November 2015 (EST) | This is not about "my edit VS. that edit", it's about making pages more encyclopedic. <b>[[User:john3637881|<span style="color: black;">John</span>]]</b> [[File:John3637881 Signature.png|20px]] <b>[[User talk:John3637881|<span style="color: red;">PK SMAAAASH!!</span>]]</b> 18:53, 3 November 2015 (EST) | ||
:Haven't you done enough trouble for now? Also, I did not undo your edit. - [[User:Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: blue">'''Drilly'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: red">'''the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Drilly Dilly|<span style="color: purple">'''Hedgehog'''</span>]] 18:54, 3 November 2015 (EST) | :Haven't you done enough trouble for now? Also, I did not undo your edit. - [[User:Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: blue">'''Drilly'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Drilly_Dilly|<span style="color: red">'''the'''</span>]] [[User talk:Drilly Dilly|<span style="color: purple">'''Hedgehog'''</span>]] 18:54, 3 November 2015 (EST) | ||
::I have to admit this whole tone thing is becoming a problem. Nobody can seem to agree on what would be good tone for articles. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Red; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px red">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:HotPink;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px hotpink">'''Flare'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Orange;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px orange">(talk)</span>]]'' 18:55, 3 November 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 19:55, November 3, 2015
About the Attributes section...
Similar to the Ganondorf page, there's an issue here on how the Attributes section should be worded. In order to avoid an edit conflict, I will bring the discussion here. My initial edit to the Attributes section was done here. I worked on tone, redundancy, and unnecessary info. The edit was undone and I'm not sure why. I asked my friend about this edit and he agreed with me that my edit was encyclopedic and improved the page.
Just a few minutes ago, I undid an edit which I felt did not improve the page, and it was promptly undone.
This is not about "my edit VS. that edit", it's about making pages more encyclopedic. John 
PK SMAAAASH!! 18:53, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- Haven't you done enough trouble for now? Also, I did not undo your edit. - Drilly the Hedgehog 18:54, 3 November 2015 (EST)
- I have to admit this whole tone thing is becoming a problem. Nobody can seem to agree on what would be good tone for articles. Disaster Flare (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2015 (EST)
