Talk:Slime
Deletion
I am against deletion. We already know that they are showing up, and as you can see with all our pages on the P5 charecters, thats enough to make them worthy of a page. Xtra
Talk Edits 07:23, June 12, 2019 (EDT)
- I believe it's too early to call the presence of Slime in Ultimate. Keep in mind, however, that Slime is present in the Panoramic and is most likely a taunt, too. If it's a background element, however, then I don't see why this page should exist. Cookies
Creme 09:05, June 12, 2019 (EDT)
- Now that created page, I think we should keep wait until we know what its role is before deciding whether to delete.--Capstalker (talk) 09:30, June 12, 2019 (EDT)
- I can do what I did with WayForward and Ubisoft and move this to my userspace for the time being, to keep it around in case we need it, though we'd have to drop the links to this page as a result. Aidan, the Rurouni 10:44, June 12, 2019 (EDT)
- Agreed. I am against deletion as well. 15DollarsWentSouth 03:07, July 20, 2019 (EDT)
- I can do what I did with WayForward and Ubisoft and move this to my userspace for the time being, to keep it around in case we need it, though we'd have to drop the links to this page as a result. Aidan, the Rurouni 10:44, June 12, 2019 (EDT)
- Now that created page, I think we should keep wait until we know what its role is before deciding whether to delete.--Capstalker (talk) 09:30, June 12, 2019 (EDT)
Given this context of being shown on Palutena's Temple, Slime is absolutely either part of a taunt or some other function separate from a stage cameo. That would certainly qualify it for a minor character page. Miles (talk) 01:20, June 13, 2019 (EDT)
To bump this a bit, I'm also in favor of keeping the page because Slimes are a very important character to the Dragon Quest universe, even if their appearance in Smash is as minor as a taunt. Considering one shows up on the panoramic banner, I think it's worth keeping. ~ Serena Strawberry (talk) 22:44, July 20, 2019 (EDT)
- Further follow-up: even if the taunt-cameo-equals-basis is considered weak, Slimes have the stage cameo and the banner art cameo to talk about, so it's a bit more than a case like Navi anyway. Miles (talk) 13:08, July 23, 2019 (EDT)
- Stage cameo is already considered weak to begin with (thus, for example, why Silver is the only GHZ character not to have a page), and the banner art cameo is even more weak, considering how it's not even an actual part of the game. But I'd be fine with "taunt cameo equals basis". Aidan, the Rurouni 13:59, July 23, 2019 (EDT)
- Yeah, it's more of a stack of all three combined that makes it worth talking about, I think. A Slime Stack, if you would. ~ Serena Strawberry (talk) 19:54, July 23, 2019 (EDT)
- Stage cameo is already considered weak to begin with (thus, for example, why Silver is the only GHZ character not to have a page), and the banner art cameo is even more weak, considering how it's not even an actual part of the game. But I'd be fine with "taunt cameo equals basis". Aidan, the Rurouni 13:59, July 23, 2019 (EDT)
Slime is not a recurring mascot it is the series mascot
I may not know a whole lot about Dragon Quest but I do know that Slime is the series mascot which is easy to find out if you look up Slime and include Dragon Quest in the search so why do you refuse to call it the series mascot and instead call it a recurring mascot it makes no sense to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.136.185.103 (talk • contribs) 09:55, July 26, 2019
- Have you even read any of the edit summaries for your reversions? CookiesCreme 10:34, July 26, 2019 (EDT)
- I did and only ONE of them gives a reason with that being it wasn't neutral which is just ridiculous because Slime IS the series mascot many sources say so if anything it just comes across as a dumb excuse not to include it.
