Talk:SLAPAYO

Now do you REALLY have to name every single glitch after yourselves? Really now... this one doesn't even have any evidence or specifics! - Gargomon251 06:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

This article is a WIP. Also, whoever discovers a glitch usually gets to name it. That's really how the nature of discovering things works. :/ FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 07:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Maybe so, but most glitches (Freeze glitch, Shadow Glitch, Zapjump, Black hole glitch, etc. are named after what they DO. I think it's just a little egotistical to name do many glitches after your crew, regardless if they discovered it. I remember many people complained about "Ink Dropping" or "Gimpyfishing". - Gargomon251 07:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Take solace that the glitch appears to have limited application, so the name should matter less because it won't exactly be a common sight. If your protest is on principle, the relevant principle is that naming rights are the prerogative of the discoverer, and the name is humorous. Ego doesn't factor into it. We didn't consider titles like 'We are awesome glitch' or 'We <3 Gargomon251,' but decided to be thematically consistent with our other glitch discovery. Though this wiki appears to be the definitive source of concrete and organized smash knowledge, colloquial names for the glitch will regardless appear on larger communities such as the Smash World Forums that won't reflect on our crew and perceived egoism. Whether the title remains the same or changes, it won't have any affect. We're just having a little fun with our discovery, and we think that's harmless.Semicolon 04:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This was discovered long before this article claimed to have discovered it. Not only is the name ridiculous, but they shouldn't have any credit for discovering it.--Simna ibn Sind 09:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)