Talk:Hookshot: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Tag: Mobile edit
(→‎Move: Since the Poltergust move just failed, I want to see if this is also a similar case of a generic name)
Tag: Mobile edit
Line 18: Line 18:
'''Support''' moving to [[Hookshot]]. It's a similar case to Daisy Bomber in my opinion, the two moves are identical in function. [[User:Rdrfc|Rdrfc]] ([[User talk:Rdrfc|talk]]) 04:49, July 1, 2019 (EDT)
'''Support''' moving to [[Hookshot]]. It's a similar case to Daisy Bomber in my opinion, the two moves are identical in function. [[User:Rdrfc|Rdrfc]] ([[User talk:Rdrfc|talk]]) 04:49, July 1, 2019 (EDT)
:Bumping. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 15:46, July 8, 2019 (EDT)
:Bumping. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 15:46, July 8, 2019 (EDT)
Since a move for [[Poltergust G-00]] just failed, I want to ask if this one should also use a generic name (aka just Hookshot), or if we should just keep this title like it currently is. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 21:06, July 11, 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:06, July 11, 2019

Archive
  1. 1

Move

The naming convention on this page is super odd. I don’t know how to explain it, but we don’t name other similar moves “and” (like Peach Bomber and Daisy Bomber). Lou Cena (talk) 19:47, June 15, 2019 (EDT)

Support on this one. Title is pretty clunky. SerpentKing 19:31, June 16, 2019 (EDT)
Many moves have been separated due to having different names, much like Gale Boomerang. Couldn't they have their own pages? Wolff (talk) 21:50, June 17, 2019 (EDT)
This is different. This is more of a Peach Bomber/Daisy Bomber situation. Plus, this is just a grab, so the content on the page is going to be barren if they’re split. Not everything should be split based on a name basis, as we discussed on the forum. Lou Cena (talk) 22:07, June 17, 2019 (EDT)
I thought the differing info on both the shots were enough to warrant their own pages? Wolff (talk) 22:33, June 17, 2019 (EDT)
When the only difference is that one is faster, I’d rather not split it. Lou Cena (talk) 00:08, June 18, 2019 (EDT)
But that's not the only difference listed. If it was, the Clawshot section would have been a whole lot shorter then the Hookshot's. Wolff (talk) 00:18, June 18, 2019 (EDT)
The differences added to the Clawshot were a universal change; they also apply to Toon Link and Young Link's Hookshots, and the auto-lock property was added to other tether moves like Samus's grapple beam, so it's not super distinguishable as a move, I don't think. DryKirby64 (talk) 00:38, June 18, 2019 (EDT)
Really? Then is there any info that only applies to the Clawshot has and not the Hookshot? Wolff (talk) 01:43, June 18, 2019 (EDT)
Not that I can think of, if we count all of the Links together. DryKirby64 (talk) 18:40, June 18, 2019 (EDT)
Even if the two stay as one, I think it needs to be rewritten a little. I am having a hard time seeing between the differences and similarities. Wolff (talk) 19:22, June 18, 2019 (EDT)

Three people (one a crat) agree to split this, and one opposes it. If anybody else has an opinion, speak now. Lou Cena (talk) 16:30, June 28, 2019 (EDT)

Bumping. Lou Cena (talk) 00:34, July 1, 2019 (EDT)

Support moving to Hookshot. It's a similar case to Daisy Bomber in my opinion, the two moves are identical in function. Rdrfc (talk) 04:49, July 1, 2019 (EDT)

Bumping. Lou Cena (talk) 15:46, July 8, 2019 (EDT)

Since a move for Poltergust G-00 just failed, I want to ask if this one should also use a generic name (aka just Hookshot), or if we should just keep this title like it currently is. Lou Cena (talk) 21:06, July 11, 2019 (EDT)