SmashWiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 3

Archive

The Admin Noticeboard is intended to be a page to quickly alert administrators to issues that need their attention.

To make a request, statement, create a new section and provide a neutral, precise summary of events with thought-out reasoning, and, if possible, links to any pages with relevant discussions. It is also a good idea to notify any users involved with the request with a link to the section on this page. Make sure to add new sections to the bottom.

Report vandals in the section labeled for such reports. Be sure to include a link to the user or IP address's contributions list.

Vandal reports

MG's "friend". Penguin of Death 11:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 13:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

This guy has now crossed the line from being merely pitifully uninformed to being a full-on vandal. Hey, I don't like C. Falcon either, but what he did is unacceptable.--Bek (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 12:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

This person is swearing and even has insulted Smash Wiki. Firewario (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked by Pikamander. – Defiant Elements +talk 21:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Mario Galaxy's "friend" Enigmatic Mr. L 15:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked by Shadowcrest. – Defiant Elements +talk 21:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Mario Galaxy's "friend" again. Firewario (talk) 11:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. – Defiant Elements +talk 14:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Silly little vandal. L33t Silvie ^{I see wat u did thar...}

Blocked. – Defiant Elements +talk 14:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

A non-sense blanker Firewario (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

A single instance which is already a day old. No need for a block. – Defiant Elements +talk 15:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Once again, MG's "friend"Firewario (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked by Pikamander. – Defiant Elements +talk 15:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

This guy; making a spam page, then re-making it and removing its SD tag. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic cntrbs 20:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked by CHawk. – Defiant Elements +talk 21:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

This one is a clear vandal. One edit says it all. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked by Pikamander. – Defiant Elements +talk 14:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Two IPs, this one and this one. Presumably the same person. Penguin of Death 09:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked by Pikamander. – Defiant Elements +talk 14:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

called DDD sexy, Snake a dick, ZSS hot, etc. Enigmatic Mr. L 20:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. – Defiant Elements +talk 20:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

This IP keeps on making the same edit to Sonic (SSBB). Penguin of Death 14:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

The IP 68.77.161.19 is a vandal lying about the release date of Super Smash Bros on Virtual Console in North America.Railizardz (talk) 15:34, September 3, 2009 (UTC)

Reverted - no real need to ban. Penguin of Death 00:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I seem to have four haters: this one, this one, this one, and this one. They are messing up my user page and my talk page. Railizardz (talk) 15:41, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Ba-Boom headshot!!! is not a "hater" - his edit to your talk page was to welcome you to the wiki, not to vandalise. The others are one-time vandal IPs - I see no reason to block them for one minor piece of vandalism each. Penguin of Death 16:22, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

This one, is stalking me and leaving me alone! BAN HIM!!!!!!!!! Railizardz (talk) 15:23, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Given that I am in fact an administrator, and this is the Administrators' noticeboard, I feel obliged to address this issue, even though it's about me.

I'm not stalking you, and I think you meant "not leaving me alone". I have been in contact with you recently because:

you created six accounts,
you claimed that you had "haters" in the form of three IPs and one user - see my comment above for details on that issue,
you created two more Warning templates after the first one had been deleted and reasons had been provided for its deletion,
you vandalised Warwick's user page.

All of my contact with you has been wholly justified. Also, please don't order us to ban people - it's rude. Instead, simply point out that a user or IP is being disruptive, and that a ban could be an appropriate solution. Thanks, Penguin of Death 15:50, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

^for great justice Shadowcrest 20:18, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Exterminated. Also, you think YOU'VE got haters? Really.L33t Silvie ^{I see wat u did thar...}

Seems like MG's "friend" never wants to give up. How can he have so many IP's? Another guy is just replacing contents with irrelevant stuff. Firewario (talk) 10:30, September 20, 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. He uses proxies, which temporarily change your IP to something random and completely different from your normal IP, so we can't just do a blanket ban. Penguin of Death 09:05, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Hi, this guy has been vandalising pages. Unfortunately, Wikia hates either me, my computer or my Internet so it crashes the Internet when ever I try to undo his edits. Can you undo them for me and possibly block him? Two vandalism articles have also been created. Also, he is now repeatedly vandalising my user page. Thank You, Solar Dragon (Talk) 20:24, September 20, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks admins for stopping him on both of his IPs. I tried my best to stop him by reverting some of his vandalism but because of that, he got a grudge against me. Thank you again. Solar Dragon (Talk) 21:22, September 20, 2009 (UTC)

This person says that Ridley bit a dog, and then vandalized Ridley's Trophy description one hour later.RAN1domchupunch!!99 02:47, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Penguin of Death 09:05, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

This guy thinks that Puff Up should be renamed to "Mofuckin' Big!"... Right... RAN1domchupunch!!99 23:19, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. Penguin of Death 09:05, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

This guy has vandalised a talk page, removed my warning on his talk page and wrote "I like Kirby" and "I like Meta Knight" on there respective Brawl articles. He did the Kirby one again after I reverted it. The Solar Dragon ^(talk) 12:41, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

He also wrote "I like Pokemon Trainer! One of my favorites!" on Pokemon Trainer's Brawl page. The Solar Dragon ^(talk) 12:43, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

He's been vandalising SmashWiki for ages, but each time he uses a different IP. He's known as "MG's "friend"" because he apparently knows MarioGalaxy off-wiki (though MG has no idea who it is) - in future, if you see similar vandalism and a talk page consisting of something like "Testing ~~~~ User:MarioGalaxy I want to brawl you!", revert the vandalism, add "[[MG's "friend"|Special:Contributions/his current IP]] to the bottom of this section and ignore the talk page as he will either revert or ignore anything you do to it. When an Admin sees what you added to this section, they'll block him and delete the talk page. It's kinda depressing that we actually have a system in place just for him... Penguin of Death 14:08, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Hey, can one of you guys check out this user. He's just vandalized a user page, as well as blanking out the same user's talk page. I can't pull a revert cause there are too many edits. You should check the history too: the user page was previously protected. RAN1domchupunch!!99 02:03, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Clarinet Hawk, but what about Sumer's user page. RAN1domchupunch!!99 02:44, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Also, if you want to undo more than one edit at once, find the last good version of the page in the page history and click on the "(cur)" link next to it - this shows you the difference between that revision and the current version - then, just click "undo" as you would do if you were just undoing one edit, and you'll be able to revert the page to the last good version. (The usual "Reverted blah:" won't appear in the edit summary box, but that's fine.) Penguin of Death 11:59, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

This one seems to have a lot of fun inserting random stuff into Wario's pages; not to mention the two warnings on his talk page... RAN1domchupunch!!99 18:02, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

I blocked him an hour ago. Penguin of Death 18:06, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

This guy would like to tell us all that edge-guarding is "gay" and edge-hogging is only used by "puss(ies)" I'd like to disagree. RAN1domchupunch!!99 11:02, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Blocked by Semi. – Defiant Elements +talk 16:26, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Koopas

I think that merging all Koopa-related pages together would be a good idea (which isn't too surprising, it being my idea). Describe everything in terms of Green Koopas, then explain the differences between the Green and Red versions for each form. Have one section on each of the forms of Koopa-kind: Shell; Koopa Troopa; Koopa Paratroopa. Describe how jumping on / attacking a Koopa Paratroopa turns it into a Koopa Troopa, how jumping on / attacking a Koopa Troopa turns it into a Shell for a period of time, and how these shells cannot take damage, but can be thrown to do damage, and can be destroyed by throwing them off the screen. Have two pictures of each of the forms, one of each colour, and a picture of each of the relevant trophies. Currently there are at least eight pages on Koopa-kind - there need only be one or two.
I'm not sure if the Green Shell (Item) and Red Shell (Item) pages could be incorporated into the one page, as there is quite a lot to say about them (e.g. damage lists) but even if they couldn't be part of the main Koopa page, they could be made into one Shell (Item) page, removing all references to the shells found in the Subspace Emissary in Brawl. The following are the Koopa pages that would be affected by the move:

Green Koopa Troopa
Red Koopa Troopa
Green Shell
Red Shell
Koopa Paratroopa
Red Koopa Paratroopa
Green shell glitch (which doesn't even have an appropriate name)
Red Shell Glitch (which is the same glitch as the above)

Penguin of Death 11:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Aside from keeping the items Green Shell and Red Shell separate, I concur. Miles (talk) 20:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Would you put everything Koopa-related all on the one page? Wouldn't that make it horribly long? Also, if the above Koopa plan is viable, I think a similar thing should be done about the members of the R.O.B. Squad, just because having a page for each member leaves the pages very short, but with a lot of repetition between them. In other news, is my signature okay? I seem to be the only person to have used the <big> coding...

Penguin of Death 21:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

A long article isn't bad by default; rather, a complete one is desirable. On second thought, though, Koopa Troopas (both colors) should be one page and Koopa Paratroopas should be another.

And for sig rules, read on. Miles (talk) 21:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Damn... I knew there was a reason why that code was never used. About the Koopa Paratroopas, is there really enough to say about them to justify their own page? And is there so little to say about Shells as items that their own page is not justified? I'd have thought that the Koopa Paratroopas were the least important of all Koopa-kind (I'm determined to make that a real phrase). I don't mind. So long as some sort of cleanup occurs, I'll be happy. Just point me (or whoever you want to do it) in the right direction, and I'll write the relevant pages. Penguin of Death 22:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

R.O.B. Squad

After the above discussion with Miles, I reworked all R.O.B. enemy pages into one R.O.B. Squad page. What do you think?
I haven't moved the original pages, and it's all one edit, so just undo it if you don't think it's appropriate. Penguin of Death 11:09, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd use that article to describe the R.O.B. Squad as a whole, and do a quick summary of each kind of R.O.B. enemy. However, I'd keep the other three articles separate from this one. Miles (talk) 12:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Image removal

It seems that multiple users, including Sonic64 and various IPs, cannot save the Palette swap (SSBB) page without all the images getting deleted. What the heck is going on? Toomai Glittershine The Stats Guy cntrbs 22:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Correction: it seems that some users cannot edit any pages without the images being removed somehow. The problem seems to be unique to new users. Toomai Glittershine

eXemplary Logic cntrbs 22:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I tried editing a page with a new account and without being logged it, but I couldn't reproduce it. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 23:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The answer is the new rich text editor (RTE) which I'm sure most older users disabled. It causes problems like:

Removing page content (images in particular).
Breaking tables.
Breaks formatting by eliminating linebreaks near <br> tags.

(for a more complete list see here)

Do we want to disable this RTE for all editors? --Shadowcrest 17:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Auto Disable it, and if people want it enough, they can turn it on for themselves. New users won't be able to understand most likely.Smoreking^(T)_(c) 17:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

It might be a good idea to make an announcement. Something like "It has been discovered that Wikia's new Rich Text Editor causes problems such as image removal. Please disable it in your preferences." Toomai Glittershine

eXemplary Logic cntrbs 18:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

We can auto-disable it for all users on the wiki, who can re-enable it in their preferences if they wish. Imo that's a much easier solution that putting it in sitenotice, which most people ignore anyway. Shadowcrest 18:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Shadowcrest. Miles (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

IP users (the ones who seem the worst affected) couldn't change it in their preferences, as they don't have an account, and even if they could, it would be unfair to rely on them to change their preferences themselves, so putting out a notice wouldn't work. Auto-disabling the Rich Text Editor is the only option. Penguin of Death 19:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

What Penguin said. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 20:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

→ copied from User talk:Clarinet Hawk:

Wikia response:
We cant do that. Its either on at the wiki, or its off. The setting to use it is on a per user setting in their global settings, we cant make it "default off" at a wiki. So if the extension is enabled at a wiki, all the people who opt to use it can, and it is turned on in the settings of all new users (something we cant adjust per wiki, since accounts are global, they dont actually get created at any 1 wiki).

So basically, we can't auto-disable it. I don't know what else we could do, aside from preventing IPs from editing and making new users disable the RTE themselves, but that seems rather extreme. :/ PenguinofDeath 17:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I think the best we can do is to somehow alert users of the problem, and just damage control the IP edits until the RTE is fixed. I know that announcements are ignored by some, but I don't see what else can be done. Toomai Glittershine The Stats Guy cntrbs 19:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

(end of copied posts)

According to w:c:guildwars:User:M.mendel, the RTE will probably never be bug-free. He thinks that unless wikia scraps the current one and designs an entirely new one, there will always be problems with it, such as image removal or messed up tables. (See here for a written declaration; he also told me on IRC "I think it will never be completely bug-free when it deals with wikicode".) Seeing that auto-disable is not an option, should we consider disabling the RTE on the wiki? (Also keep in mind that we can add it later if they do get around to fixing it.) I don't know about you all, but running damage control for forever seems like a waste of time to me. --Shadowcrest 02:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Endless damage control is boring, so either disable it, or block IPs from editing (if possible). The latter would save us a lot of trouble in other areas, but would greatly reduce the number of good faith edits as well. I'm not sure - one of the two. Penguin of Death 04:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm with Shadowcrest on getting rid of it for the whole wiki, at least til it's less glitchy. Miles (talk) 19:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm also in favor of disabling the RTE. The limited benefits of having the RTE enabled are far outweighed by the hassle it creates. – Defiant Elements +talk 18:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Requesting article deletion

I'd like to request that the article written about me in the smashers section be removed. I do not want my personal information open to the internet. This is the page: Smasher:Levi. I am removing all personal information regarding myself until the entire article is deleted. Also I am removing my brother's name from his page to maintain his anonymity. The article on him: Smasher:Neat. Mariownage (talk) 08:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

If you think an article should be deleted, please tag it using {{delete|reason why it should be deleted}}. Penguin of Death 08:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

SSBM fighters' Overview/Gameplay/X in competitive play sections

So I was talking to Pikamander2 here, and he suggested taking my question here. My full reasoning can be found on his talk page, but in short, about 6 or so Melee fighters' have a short, messy section similar to attributes, though under a different name. I believe we (and by "we" I mean me) should replece those sections with an attribute section based off the pros and cons already there. Agreed? Enigmatic Mr. L 02:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

If it would improve the articles, do it. Penguin of Death 04:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Sock puppetry

A little after I left a message about my leave on my user and talk pages, an account named Forenzza radio was created and then proceeded to try and offend me on my talk page. I didn't egg him on, so he then left me a message on Zeldapedia (see here), where he admitted to creating the account to "stem any turmoil" that would have happened, under his normal account, I assume. He then told me he was imitating the users I had offended at SmashWiki and that I should tell an admin just so they could see how I had "belittled Smash Wiki to the lowest level possible". I just thought you might be interested in finding out the IP of the account to see what user it is that's operating a sock puppet and throwing around personal attacks. Thanks for the time.

--Baltro (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

I dunno if this is relevant, but there's now a Forenzzza radio 2 account that was just made. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 00:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

You're right. In my opinion, that only worsens the offense. --Baltro (talk) 04:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Protection

~~Can someone protect this page please? It seems to be a vandal magnet. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 00:26, September 14, 2009 (UTC)~~

One vandalism does not a target make. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 22:18, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

It's been vandalized more than once. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 00:53, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

...you mean twice? Shadowcrest 19:12, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

There were some issues when it was being made, but that's about it. I thought there was more than that. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 22:27, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Pokémon

There are way too many Pokémon pages and I suggest some of them should be merged. I see a similar issue has come up before with Koopas. Tuth (talk) 15:38, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I think we're okay for Pokémon pages. The rule is that all trophies should have their own article, and that no character that only makes an appearance in the series as a sticker deserves its own article. As far as I know, all Pokémon pages stick to that rule, so they're all fine. The problem with the Koopa pages is that they're not very well organised or standardised. Penguin of Death 16:18, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

SmashWiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 3

Contents

Vandal reports

Koopas

R.O.B. Squad

Image removal

Requesting article deletion

SSBM fighters' Overview/Gameplay/X in competitive play sections

Sock puppetry

Protection

Pokémon

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Participate

Tools