Forum:Featured articles: Difference between revisions
(New Page: {{Forumheader|Brawl Talk}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> I have seen that the DK(SSBB) page was missing many conten...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think it should be featured because it explains how well he does in competitive play, shows move information such as how much start-up and ending lag his moves have, contains a link to a visual representation of his move hitboxes and explained how he was buffed and nerfed from Melee. I have compared other articles with this one and I think there is nothing more I can add in. But the page could have some grammar issues especially on the event match section but otherwise I think it is a good article that could be featured. But someone experienced should take a look at it because I have only been on this wiki for two months.[[User:LordGanondorf|LordGanondorf]] ([[User talk:LordGanondorf|talk]]) 16:59, 13 May 2013 (EDT) | I think it should be featured because it explains how well he does in competitive play, shows move information such as how much start-up and ending lag his moves have, contains a link to a visual representation of his move hitboxes and explained how he was buffed and nerfed from Melee. I have compared other articles with this one and I think there is nothing more I can add in. But the page could have some grammar issues especially on the event match section but otherwise I think it is a good article that could be featured. But someone experienced should take a look at it because I have only been on this wiki for two months.[[User:LordGanondorf|LordGanondorf]] ([[User talk:LordGanondorf|talk]]) 16:59, 13 May 2013 (EDT) | ||
:None of the character articles are feature worthy really. They're missing information, have outdated information, contain incorrect information, poorly written, etc. | |||
[[ | :The ICs article shouldn't have been featured, and the only one that's close to feature worthy is {{SSBB|Wolf}}. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 17:27, 13 May 2013 (EDT) | ||
:For future reference, go [[SmashWiki:Featured_content|here]] to submit featured content. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:Anon.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 18:51, 13 May 2013 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:51, May 13, 2013
I have seen that the DK(SSBB) page was missing many content compared to other articles, so I decided to edit the page as best as I could. I added his victory and idle poses, taunts, character roll call music, all event matches he appears in, one piece of trivia, using stickers section where I explained which stickers he benefits from the most and the least and finally I also added that he had received a new palette swap, and I was happy with the results after I finished the editing. And I could not find a place of where I could propose to feature the article.
I think it should be featured because it explains how well he does in competitive play, shows move information such as how much start-up and ending lag his moves have, contains a link to a visual representation of his move hitboxes and explained how he was buffed and nerfed from Melee. I have compared other articles with this one and I think there is nothing more I can add in. But the page could have some grammar issues especially on the event match section but otherwise I think it is a good article that could be featured. But someone experienced should take a look at it because I have only been on this wiki for two months.LordGanondorf (talk) 16:59, 13 May 2013 (EDT)
- None of the character articles are feature worthy really. They're missing information, have outdated information, contain incorrect information, poorly written, etc.
