Talk:Sonic (PM)

About the Attributes section...

Similar to the Ganondorf page, there's an issue here on how the Attributes section should be worded. In order to avoid an edit conflict, I will bring the discussion here. My initial edit to the Attributes section was done here. I worked on tone, redundancy, and unnecessary info. The edit was undone and I'm not sure why. I asked my friend about this edit and he agreed with me that my edit was encyclopedic and improved the page.

Just a few minutes ago, I undid an edit which I felt did not improve the page, and it was promptly undone.

This is not about "my edit VS. that edit", it's about making pages more encyclopedic. John PK SMAAAASH!! 18:53, 3 November 2015 (EST)

Haven't you done enough trouble for now? Also, I did not undo your edit. - Drilly the Hedgehog 18:54, 3 November 2015 (EST)

I have to admit this whole tone thing is becoming a problem. Nobody can seem to agree on what would be good tone for articles. Disaster Flare (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2015 (EST)

Note that I don't wanna cause any trouble here, and I know you understand. - Drilly the Hedgehog 18:57, 3 November 2015 (EST)