Talk:Indirect

Move

I think this should be moved to the simpler "Indirect". Yeah it's moving from an official name, but I posit that it's a confusing name, since the idea has nothing to do with special attacks (and it looks so similar to the Special: namespace).

Presumably, if this move goes through, "Specials: Direct" would take over the existing redirect to "Nintendo Direct". Toomai Glittershine The Wacko 23:47, 15 October 2014 (EDT)

Because of SW:OFFICIAL, its similarity to the "Special:" namespace, and the fact that it has nothing to do with special attacks, I would agree with a move. Rtzxy Smashing! 18:52, 19 October 2014 (EDT)

Oppose It is marked in-game as Specials:Indirect and people looking this up generally will from the game (i.e. to see what it means) and will then use the title from the game.Mkbw50 (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2014 (EDT)

We would still have the current title as a redirect. Toomai Glittershine The Bold 13:23, 1 November 2014 (EDT)

Support, per what Toomai said. And an extra thing: We'd have to create a Direct (disambiguation) page as well, if this move is to go through. Qwerty (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2014 (EST)