Forum:Invitational Tournament Predictions: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:


:::::I only named 2 of the 16 slots: the 2 most likely to get picked first. And even if it is Smash 4, it would look weird as **** seeing Mango and Armada fight round 1. Yes, to brawl and melee players alike; everyone knows who the Kings are. And speaking of brawl, I never implied or meant to imply Brawl players won't get invites. I actually don't really care who the eventual 16 people will be, though there are very, very good guesses. And are you actually opposed to changing it from FD Only to FD + Battlefield + whatever neutral looking stages that have been released? Do you mean to say it would be best if we just played FD only, no questions asked? If it "isn't optimal," why not take steps to fix it NOW. Like I said we only need like 5 stages for proper striking.--<span style="background-color:#6d84e1;border:3px solid silver">[[User:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:silver">'''Brian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:black">Don't try me!</span>]]</sup>[[File:Falco.gif|link=|27px]]</span> 16:32, 30 April 2014 (EDT)
:::::I only named 2 of the 16 slots: the 2 most likely to get picked first. And even if it is Smash 4, it would look weird as **** seeing Mango and Armada fight round 1. Yes, to brawl and melee players alike; everyone knows who the Kings are. And speaking of brawl, I never implied or meant to imply Brawl players won't get invites. I actually don't really care who the eventual 16 people will be, though there are very, very good guesses. And are you actually opposed to changing it from FD Only to FD + Battlefield + whatever neutral looking stages that have been released? Do you mean to say it would be best if we just played FD only, no questions asked? If it "isn't optimal," why not take steps to fix it NOW. Like I said we only need like 5 stages for proper striking.--<span style="background-color:#6d84e1;border:3px solid silver">[[User:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:silver">'''Brian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:black">Don't try me!</span>]]</sup>[[File:Falco.gif|link=|27px]]</span> 16:32, 30 April 2014 (EDT)
::::::"''And even if it is Smash 4, it would look weird as **** seeing Mango and Armada fight round 1.''"
::::::When it's 16 top players in a game no one ever played before? It makes absolutely no difference whatsoever, stop sucking Melee's dick all the time, the two best players there are not going to be automatically the best players in a game no one ever played (especially in a pool of 14 other top players on pretty much the same skill tier). Also, why the hell are you self-censoring yourself?
::::::"''Yes, to brawl and melee players alike; everyone knows who the Kings are.''"
::::::So you directly insinuate now that the Melee players are superior and should be treated better in a completely neutral game no one ever played, can you ever stop being so biased towards Melee? How many times must I point out to you that this sort of attitude just makes the Melee community look bad and dissuades Brawl (and soon-to-be Smash 4) players, along with other potential new players, from having anything to do with Melee?
::::::"''And are you actually opposed to changing it from FD Only to FD + Battlefield + whatever neutral looking stages that have been released? Do you mean to say it would be best if we just played FD only, no questions asked?''"
::::::I'm saying it doesn't matter for this tournament in the slightest, when it's a showcase tournament before release played on a demo version that wouldn't have probably even half the stages available, and that it's the last thing (besides seeding, which is such a ridiculously awful complaint for this) to get your panties in a bunch over. As long as it's not all stages on random and not playing on janky stages, it's perfectly fine for this tournament, and there isn't going to be a real practical difference here between FD only, BF only, FD+BF+other stage deemed "neutral".
::::::"''If it "isn't optimal," why not take steps to fix it NOW. Like I said we only need like 5 stages for proper striking.''"
::::::Because it's not going to make a real difference either way, and for the latter point, you seemed to have ignored when I pointed out that A: it's a demo version that won't have many of the stages available, and B: we never played on the stages here before and would have no idea how they would actually work outside FD and BF. Expecting a full stagelist with full counterpicking here is being completely unrealistic and overdemanding, and for a showcase demo event like this, it's best to go with the safe option (i.e. FD or BF only) instead of experimenting with something that could really fuck the event up (again, we don't know how the hell the other stages would actually play, and of any potential bugs they could have). <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 17:11, 30 April 2014 (EDT)