SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Aidanzapunk: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Belongs here.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
=== [[User:Aidanzapunk|Aidanzapunk]] ([[User talk:Aidanzapunk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aidanzapunk|contribs]] • [[Special:Editcount/Aidanzapunk|edit count]] • [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship|RFA page]]) ===
=== [[User:Aidanzapunk|Aidanzapunk]] ([[User talk:Aidanzapunk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aidanzapunk|contribs]] • [[Special:Editcount/Aidanzapunk|edit count]] • [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Aidanzapunk|RFA page]]) ===


''Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.''<br>
''Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.''<br>

Revision as of 13:28, October 20, 2015

Aidanzapunk (talkcontribsedit countRFA page)

Candidate, please summarize why you are running for adminship below.
Well, let's see here...um...well, for one, I'm active most of the time, arguably more so than other admins on this site. For two, I have a very good idea of what should and shouldn't go on here. For three, the time the rollbackers had to stall this recent vandal is quite frankly ridiculous.

I have a computer that I can use, but I have access to my phone at all times, so I can work from both systems. In addition to that, thanks to my phone, I'm one of the fastest users here to respond to something, so I can deal with vandalism quickly should it turn up.

I'd appreciate thoughts on this, and I do hope this goes well.

Support

  1. EXTREME Support You are an excellent rollbacker, very kind to others, not wanting to abuse admin powers, and a great RFA candidate. INoMedssig.png INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT)

Oppose

  1. ...

Neutral

  1. Neutral Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is made in America 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT)

Comments