Forum:Discovered by: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Fixing) |
m (1 revision: pages) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} | {{Forumheader|Watercooler}} | ||
I really don't think we should put in the discovered by things on some glitches/techniques. [[Wavedashing]] and [[freeze glitch]] | I really don't think we should put in the discovered by things on some glitches/techniques. [[Wavedashing]] and [[freeze glitch]] are examples. How do we honestly know this was the first person to ever have this happen to them? [[User:Solar flute|Solar flute]] ([[User talk:Solar flute|talk]]) 00:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Policy says it's the person who documents it first who gets credit. Some of these, like, ironically, both of your suggested articles, are well known to be the discoverers and documenters via SmashBoards. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 01:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:59, October 1, 2010
Forums: Index → Watercooler → Discovered by
I really don't think we should put in the discovered by things on some glitches/techniques. Wavedashing and freeze glitch are examples. How do we honestly know this was the first person to ever have this happen to them? Solar flute (talk) 00:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Policy says it's the person who documents it first who gets credit. Some of these, like, ironically, both of your suggested articles, are well known to be the discoverers and documenters via SmashBoards. Semicolon (talk) 01:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
