Template:Proposed: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(Undid edit by SmashBall104: totally the wrong place for this)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Category:Proposed policies]]
[[Category:Proposed policies]]
</includeonly>
</includeonly>
'''Description:'''
I think this policy should be established, so users who don't contribute much can be more productive, and make some careless users think twice about the consequence of being blocked. I think that any admin, sysop, patroller, bureaucrat, or other promoted user who catches a rule-breaker should put a notice on their talk page, saying they are on trial and cannot edit until the trial is up. Then the person will choose some admins from the list, and tell them that they are selected to participate in the trial, and during then, the group of admins will decide whether the user should receive a block of a given time (chosen by the admin who put them on trial), community service for a given time, or let off the hook. During trial, the user in trouble can contribute to the argument.
'''Block:'''
If blocked, the user can only be unblocked by the admin who put them on trial.
'''Community Service:'''
If the user is put on community service, they will be forced to clean up the wiki by tending to articles in need of clean up, removing trolling messages, and deleting false comments. The admin who caught them breaking the rules must monitor them by checking their contributions often, and if the rule-breaker does anything wiki-related outside of that, they will be confirmed to receive a block. Also, users sentenced to community service can receive requests for wiki clean up on their talk pages from other users. Like a block, once the given time is up, the user is free.
'''Off the Hook:'''
If the user is let off the hook during trial, they will simply be released with a warning for rule breaking.

Revision as of 20:16, December 4, 2012