Forum:Console Articles: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
::Guys. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 21:13, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
::Guys. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">Blue Ninjakoopa</span>]]</font><sup>([[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|Talk]])</sup> 21:13, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
:::^ [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 21:44, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
:::^ [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 21:44, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
There's really no need to be impatient enough to bump something after 6 hours.
As for my opinion, while I agree the possible information is limited, I find it hard to imagine a game-based wiki that lacks articles on the platforms its games are on. Despite the articles' rather limited usefulness, they're most likely expected by the public. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Honcho 21:51, 5 August 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:51, August 5, 2011

Forums: Index Watercooler Console Articles

Are they really necessary? Looks like a bunch of unneeded information on top of a chart that could otherwise be explained on character articles. Only three consoles hosted Super Smash Bros. games (N64 - SSB, GCN - SSBM, Wii - SSBB), and even they hold little relevant information other than the charts on their pages. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 23:22, 3 August 2011 (EDT)

I agree. Having articles about key games is one thing, but the console articles are just lists of characters that appeared. Honestly I think the Wii is the only necessary one, as all three games are available on it. Mr. Anon (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
Bump. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 15:14, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
Guys. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 21:13, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
^ Mr. Anon (talk) 21:44, 5 August 2011 (EDT)

There's really no need to be impatient enough to bump something after 6 hours.

As for my opinion, while I agree the possible information is limited, I find it hard to imagine a game-based wiki that lacks articles on the platforms its games are on. Despite the articles' rather limited usefulness, they're most likely expected by the public. Toomai Glittershine ??? The Honcho 21:51, 5 August 2011 (EDT)