Related changes
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.
March 19, 2024
- Smasher:Hax 00:46 0 174.168.104.205 talk
March 18, 2024
- Palutena (SSBU) 22:58 +13 Ebrahim talk contribs Tag: Mobile edit
- m Smasher:DKwill 14:31 +88 Cookies and Creme talk contribs (→Super Smash Bros. Ultimate)
- m Smasher:John Numbers 14:03 +87 Cookies and Creme talk contribs (→Super Smash Bros. Ultimate)
- m Smasher:MikeHaze 11:49 +25 Omega Tyrant talk contribs (In the VIP players voting on the Discord server, succeeded in garnering a supermajority support and so is being added to this category, due to his longevity as being a top/borderline top level player across all of Brawl and then later 2010s Melee, as well as having been arguably the greatest Brawl Marth.)
- Smasher:John Numbers 11:33 +80 Wiifitkid talk contribs (→Tournament placings) Tag: Mobile edit
- Smasher:A Rookie 04:44 +359 209.193.43.54 talk
March 17, 2024
- Joker (SSBU) 11:43 +81 Diddy Kongstar talk contribs (→Update history)
March 16, 2024
- Mr. Game & Watch (SSBM) 23:49 +58 PowerShield03 talk contribs (→Most historically significant players: honestly can’t find much about Snap's Game and Watch as his Fox is more prevalent nowadays, so I’m gonna axe him for now)
- m Module:Trn/data 19:43 +5 Omega Tyrant talk contribs (Upgrading Sumabato X Final to supermajor, as unanimously voted in the Discord server)
- m Smasher:John Numbers 18:11 −17 Cookies and Creme talk contribs
March 14, 2024
- Marth (SSBM) 18:13 +11 PowerShield03 talk contribs (→Most historically significant players)
- Palutena (SSBU) 06:13 +260 93.67.212.119 talk (→Changes from Super Smash Bros. 4)
March 12, 2024
- Joker (SSBU) 20:58 +71 Diddy Kongstar talk contribs
- m Marth (PM) 12:26 +1 Omega Tyrant talk contribs (A "notable tech" subsection isn't standard for the competitive play section, especially if it's just an external link, and anything actually significant should be explained within the article text)